Is God Morally Indifferent? The Problem of Inference according to David Hume

Main Article Content

Milena Jakubiak

Abstract

The article is devoted to an analysis of David Hume’s position on God’s benevolence in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. The focal point is the problem of inference and the accompanying arguments concerning the relations between good and evil, as well as the four circumstances in which evil enters the world. In the conclusion, I discuss the hypothesis of moral indifference as Hume’s skeptical voice in the debate on the possibility of inferring the moral attributes of God on the basis of experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jakubiak, Milena. 2018. “Is God Morally Indifferent? The Problem of Inference According to David Hume”. Diametros 58 (58), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1283.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Milena Jakubiak

Milena Jakubiak
Instytut Filozofii US
ul. Krakowska 71-79
71-004 Szczecin
E-mail: milena.m.jakubiak@gmail.com

Share |

References

Andre S. (1993), Was Hume an Atheist?, „Hume Studies” 1 (19): 141–166.
View in Google Scholar

Butler J. (2011), The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed to the Constitution and Course of Nature to Which are Added, Two Brief Dissertations, Kindle Edition.
View in Google Scholar

Davis J.W. (1987), Going Out the Window: A Comment on Tweyman, „Hume Studies” 1 (13): 86–97.
View in Google Scholar

Dye J. (1992), Demea’s Departure, „Hume Studies” 18 (2): 467–482.
View in Google Scholar

Gale R.M. (1993), On the Nature and the Existence of God, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Gaskin J.C.A. (1988), Hume’s Philosophy of Religion, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands.
View in Google Scholar

Grzeliński A. (2009), Kategoria zła w empiryzmie Davida Hume’a, [w:] Koncepcje i problemy filozofii zła, R. Wiśniewski i M. Jaranowski (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, Toruń: 13–33.
View in Google Scholar

Hochfeldowa A. (1962), Dawida Hume’a „Dialogi o religii naturalnej”, [w:] D. Hume, Dialogi o religii naturalnej. Naturalna historia religii wraz z dodatkami, PWN, Warszawa: VII–LIII.
View in Google Scholar

Howard-Snyder D., Bergmann M., Rowe W.L. (2005), An Exchange on the Problem of Evil, [w:] God and the Problem of Evil, William L. Rowe (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford: 124–158.
View in Google Scholar

Hubaczek K. (2011), Bóg a zło. Problematyka teodycealna w filozofi i analitycznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar

Hume D. (1962), Dialogi o religii naturalnej. Naturalna historia religii wraz z dodatkami, tłum. A. Hochfeldowa, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Hume D. (2005), Badania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego wraz z apendyksami, tłum. D. Misztal i T. Sieczkowski, Zielona Sowa, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Hume D. (2007), Rozdz. 7. Czwarta obiekcja, tłum. A. Grzeliński, „Nowa Krytyka” 20–21: 325–332.
View in Google Scholar

Judycki S. (2009), Wszechmoc i istnienie, „Diametros” 21: 30–62.
View in Google Scholar

Kraay K.J. (2003), Philo’s Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered, „Hume Studies” 2 (29): 283–294.
View in Google Scholar

Leibniz G.W. (2001), Teodycea. O dobroci Boga, wolności człowieka i pochodzeniu zła, tłum. M. Frankiewicz, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Logan B. (1996), Why Hume Wasn’t an Atheist: A Reply to Andre, „Hume Studies” 22 (1): 193–202.
View in Google Scholar

Malebranche N. (2003), Dialogi o metafizyce i religii. Dialogi o śmierci, tłum. P. Rak, ANTYK, Kęty.
View in Google Scholar

Malebranche N. (2011), Poszukiwanie prawdy, tłum. M. Frankiewicz, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Nathan G. (1987), Comments on Tweyman and Davis, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 98–103.
View in Google Scholar

O’Connor D. (2001), Hume on Religion, Routledge, London/New York.
View in Google Scholar

O’Connor D. (2003), Skepticism and Philo’s Atheistic Preferences, „Hume Studies” 29 (2): 267–282.
View in Google Scholar

Pike N. (2005), Hume on Evil, [w:] God and the Problem of Evil, W.L. Rowe (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Sieczkowski T. (2007), Qui pro quo Dialogów, czyli pytanie o status teologii naturalnej, „Nowa Krytyka” 20–21: 265–301.
View in Google Scholar

Spryszak P. (2005), O „teizmie empirycznym w Dialogach o religii naturalnej Dawida Hume’a,„Studia z Historii Filozofii” 6 (2): 59–80.
View in Google Scholar

Tweyman S. (1987), Hume’s Dialogues on Evil, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 74–85.
View in Google Scholar

Wadia P.S. (1987), Commentary on Professor Tweyman’s “Hume on Evil”, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 104–112.
View in Google Scholar

Yandell K.E. (1990), Hume’s “Inexplicable Mystery”. His Views on Religion, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
View in Google Scholar