Abandoning Truth is not a Solution. A Discussion with Richard Rorty

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1243
Keywords:
Richard Rorty constructivism universal justification truth interests dialog

Main Article Content

Marcin Kilanowski
The Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Abstract

Richard Rorty suggests that we should stop looking for something common to us all, for universal justifi cations and truth. Rorty argues that focusing on a single truth sooner or later serves those who claim that there is a proper, true model of living. In the end, they use violence and cause pain, as they are driven by the idea that everyone should accept their truth. In this article I shall argue that such reasoning is not justifi ed and whether we are universalists or constructivists, our actions may be the same and cause pain. At the same time, having the same beliefs will not stop us from acting differently. What matters is how we use a particular concept in accordance with our interests and not the concept itself. I shall also argue that dialog can help to prevent violence and that while Rorty is right, there are also a number of problems with that proposition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kilanowski, Marcin. 2018. “Abandoning Truth Is Not a Solution. A Discussion With Richard Rorty”. Diametros 16 (61):34-50. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1243.
Issue
No. 61 (2019)
Section
Articles

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Marcin Kilanowski, The Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Marcin KilanowskiThe Nicolaus Copernicus University in ToruńFaculty of Law and AdministrationDepartment of Theory of Law and State ul. Władysława Bojarskiego 387-100 ToruńE-mail: markil@umk.pl
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Auxier R., Hahn L. (eds) (2010), Philosophy of Richard Rorty. Library of living philosophers, Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar

Berlin I. (1991), “Two Concepts of Liberty,” [in:] Liberty, D. Miller (ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 33–57.
View in Google Scholar

Berlin I. (1998), The Sense of Reality, Studies in Ideas and Their History, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Brandom R. (2000), Rorty and His Critics, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Curtis W. (2015), Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and Liberal Virtue, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316272145

Deliege R. (2001), The Untouchables of India, Berg 3PL, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Deva S. (2012), Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business, Routledge, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125618

Engel P. (2007), What’s the Use of Truth?, Columbia University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Fromm E. (1994), Escape from Freedom, Henry Holt Company Inc, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Gebel E. (1946/1983), “Letter to Robert Scholl,” trans. A.R. Schultz, [in:] I. Scholl, The White Rose. Munich, 1942–1943, University Press of New England, Lebanon, New Hempshire: 138–147.
View in Google Scholar

Guignon Ch., Hiley D. (2003), Richard Rorty (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951

Gross N. (2008), Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226309910.001.0001

Habermas J. (1981), Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston.
View in Google Scholar

Hanser R. (2012), A Noble Treason: The Story of Sophie Scholl and the White Rose Revolt Against Hitler, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
View in Google Scholar

Kaiser R. (1987), “A Fifth Gospel, Almost Chief Seattle’s Speech(es): American Origin and European Reception,” [in:] Indians and Europe: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays, Ch. Feest (ed), Heredot im Rader Verlag, Aachen: 505–526.
View in Google Scholar

Kennedy D. (2004), “Human Rights, Part of the Problem?” [in:] D. Kennedy, The Dark Sides of Virtue, Reassessing International Humanitarianism, Princeton University Press, Princeton & Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840731

Kilanowski M. (2013), Ku wolności jako odpowiedzialności. Dewey, Rorty, Habermas o nowej jakości w demokracji, Wydawnictwo UMK, Toruń.
View in Google Scholar

Kilanowski M. (2015), “Towards a Responsible and Rational Ethical Discussion – A Critique of Putnam’s Pragmatic Approach,” [in:] Philosophy of Hilary Putnam, Library of living philosophers, R.E. Auxier, D.R. Anderson, L.E. Hahn (eds), Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago: 827–862.
View in Google Scholar

Kilanowski M. (2017), “What Kind of Politics Do We Need? Toward Freedom as Responsibility in Habermas’s and Rorty’s Visions of Democracy,” Kultura i Edukacja – Culture and Education 116 (2): 50–68.
View in Google Scholar

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013).
View in Google Scholar

Lamb R. (2009), “For and Against Ownership: William Godwin’s Theory of Property,” The Review of Politics 71 (2): 275–302.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670509000345

Nałkowska Z. (2000), Medallions, trans. D. Kuprel, Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL.
View in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset J. (1994), The Revolt of the Masses, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Osiatyński W. (2009), Human Rights and Their Limits, Cambridge University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808333

Pable A. (2015), “Integrating Rorty and (Social) Constructivism: A View from Harrisian Semiology,” Social Epistemology 29 (1): 95–117.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782587

Proudhon P.-J. (2008), What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government, Forgotten Books, London.
View in Google Scholar

United States, Congress, House, Committee on Un-American Activities (1946), Publications Relating to Various Aspects of Communism 15 (1), Washington.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty R. (2008), An Ethics for Today, Columbia University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1992), “A Pragmatist View of Rationality and Cultural Difference,” Philosophy East and West 42 (4): 581–596.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1399670

Rorty R. (1989), Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397

Rorty R. (1996), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski, J. Niź nik, T. Sanders (eds), Praeger Publishers, Westport.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1991), Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609039

Rorty R. (1993), “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality,” [in:] R. Rorty, On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures, S. Shute, S. Hurley (eds), Basic Books, New York: 111–134.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1997), “Is it Desirable to Love Truth?” [in:] R. Rorty, Truth, Politics and ‘Post-Modernism’, Van Gorcum, Assen: 11–33.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty R. (1991), Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643

Rorty R. (2015), “Putnam, Pragmatism and Parmenides,” [in:] Philosophy of Hilary Putnam, R.E. Auxier, D.R. Anderson, L.E. Hahn (eds), Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago: 863–881.
View in Google Scholar

Shklar J. (1976), Legalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
View in Google Scholar

Srivastava B.N. (1997), Manual Scavenging in India: A Disgrace to the Country, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.
View in Google Scholar