Sartre and Merleau-Ponty’s Theories of Perception as Cognition in the Context of Phenomenological Thought in Cognitive Sciences

Main Article Content

Marta Agata Chojnacka
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-3882

Abstract

Husserl’s phenomenology was particularly influential for a number of French philosophers and their theories. Two of the most prominent French thinkers, Jean-Paul Sartre and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, turned to the instruments offered by phenomenology in their attempts to understand the notions of the body, consciousness, imagination, human being, world and many others. Both philosophers also provided their definitions of perception, but they understood this notion in very different ways. The paper describes selected aspects of Husserl’s phenomenology that were adopted by Sartre and Merleau-Ponty and depicts the presumptions of their respective theories of perception, as well as the differences between them. The main thesis presented here is that theories as different as those proposed by Sartre and Merleau-Ponty may, and indeed do, lead to the same conclusion, i.e. that perception represents a different form of cognition. Despite the differences between these theories, they can both be placed in the contemporary context of phenomenological research carried out by cognitive philosophers Dan Zahavi and Shaun Gallagher, as well as by the proponent of the enactive theory of perception, Alva Noë.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chojnacka, Marta Agata. 2020. “Sartre and Merleau-Ponty’s Theories of Perception As Cognition in the Context of Phenomenological Thought in Cognitive Sciences”. Diametros 18 (67):21-37. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1197.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Marta Agata Chojnacka, Institute of Philosophy Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Poland

Marta Agata Chojnacka, PhDUniversity of Nicolaus Copernicusul. Fosa Staromiejska 1a87-100 ToruńEmail: martaagatachojnacka@gmail.com          m_chojnacka@tlen.pl
Share |

References

Benoist J. (2001), L’idée de phénoménologie, Vrin, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Bickhard M.H. (1996), "Troubles with Computationalism,” [in:] The Philosophy of Psychology, W. O’Donohue, W. Kitchener (eds.), Sage, London: 173–183.
View in Google Scholar

Breeur R. (2005), Autour de Sartre. La conscience mise à nu, Millon, Grenoble.
View in Google Scholar

Brodsky J. (1981), “A Paradigm Case for Merleau-Ponty: The Ambiguity of Perception and the Paintings of Paul Cézanne,” Artibus et Historiae 2 (4): 125–134.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1483119

Brook A. (2008), “Phenomenology: Contribution to Cognitive Science,” Abstracta 3: 54–70.
View in Google Scholar

Bruzina R. (2004), “Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Moving Beyond the Paradigms,” Husserl Studies 20 (1): 43–88.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HSTU.0000015941.08655.dc

Cabestan P. (2015), Qui suis-je? Sartre et la question du sujet, Hermann, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Carman T. (2008), Merleau-Ponty, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461853

Chemero A. (2009), Radical Embodied Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001

Clark A. (1999), “Embodied, Situated and Distributed Cognition,” [in:] A Companion to Cognitive Science, W. Bechtel, G. Graham (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford: 506–517.
View in Google Scholar

Cohen-Solal A. (1985), Sartre 1905–1980, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Contat M., Rybalka M. (1970), Les écrits de Sartre, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Coorebyter de V. (2000), Sartre face à la phénoménologie. Autour L’intentionnalité et de La transcendance de l’Égo, Vrin, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Crowell S. (ed.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521513340

DeLay S. (2019), Phenomenology in France: A Philosophical and Theological Introduction, Routledge, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315272115

Depraz N. (2006), “Comprendre la phénoménologie. Une pratique concrète,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 129 (2): 149–165.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rphi.042.0149

Depraz N. (2011), A l’épreuve de l’expérience. Pour une pratique phénoménologique, Zeta Books, Bucharest.
View in Google Scholar

Depraz N., Varela F., Vermersch P. (2003), On Becoming Aware. A Pragmatics of Experiencing, Benjamin Press, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.43

Dreyfus H.L., Hall H. (1982), Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Farina G. (2014), “Quelques réflexions sur l’Esquisse d’une théorie des émotions à propos de l’affectivité de la pensés,” Études Sartriennes 17–18: 7–21.
View in Google Scholar

Fruteau de Laclos F. (2012), La psychologie des philosophes de Bergson à Vernant, PUF, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.frute.2012.01

Gallagher S. (2011), "Interpretations of Embodied Cognition,” The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, Imprint Academic, Exeter.
View in Google Scholar

Gallagher S., Schmicking D. (2010), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Springer, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0

Gallagher S. (2012), Phenomenology, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283801

Gallagher S., Zahavi D. (2008), Phenomenological Mind, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086599

Gerassi J. (1989), Jean-Paul Sartre. Hated Conscience of His Century, vol. I: Protestant or Protester?, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar

Gibson J. (2015), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218

Husserl E. (1989), Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Kluwer, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2233-4

Kaelin E. (1962), An Existentialist Aesthetic, The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.
View in Google Scholar

Landgrebe L. (1973), “The Phenomenological Concept of Experience,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1): 1–13.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2106776

Levinas E. (1930), La théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, Alcan, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Macan Ch. (1993), Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Routledge, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Marshall G. (2008), A Guide to Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, Marquette University Press, Milwaukee.
View in Google Scholar

Martinich A.P., Stroll A. (2020), “The History of Epistemology,” [in:] Encyclopaedia Britannica, URL = https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology/The-history-of-epistemology#ref309032 [Accessed 15.12.2016].
View in Google Scholar

McCulloch G. (1994), Using Sartre. An Analytical Introduction to Early Sartrean Themes, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1955), Les Aventures de la dialectique, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1975), Les sciences de l’homme et la phénoménologie, Centre de documentation universitaire, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (1992), Sense and Non-Sense, Northwestern University Press, Illinois.
View in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M. (2002), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. D.A. Landes, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610

Merleau-Ponty M. (2004), The World of Perception, trans. O. Davis, Taylor & Francis e-Library, Milton Park.
View in Google Scholar

Mouillie J.-M. (2001), Sartre et la phénoménologie, ENS, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mouil.2000.01

Neubauer B.E., Witkop C.T., Varpio L. (2019), “How Phenomenology Can Help us Learn from the Experiences of Others,” Perspectives on Medical Education 8 (2): 90–97.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2

Noë A. (2004), Action in Perception, MIT Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Pepper K. (2014), “The Phenomenology of Sensorimotor Understanding,” [in:] Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory, J.M. Bishop, A.O. Martin (eds.), Springer, Berlin: 53–67.
View in Google Scholar

Pokropski M. (2011), “Ciało. Od fenomenologii do kognitywistyki,” Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki 4 (32): 119–137.
View in Google Scholar

Rizk H. (2011), Comprendre Sartre, Colin, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (1961), “Merleau-Ponty vivant,” Les Temps Modernes 184–185: 304–376.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (1964), Situations IV, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (2003a), Being and Nothingness, trans. H.E. Barnes, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (2003b), Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl: L'intentionnalité, Vrin, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (2004a), The Transcendence of the Ego. A Sketch for a Phenomenological Description, trans. A. Brown, Routledge Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (2004b), The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination, trans. J. Webber, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P. (2010), “Carnets de la drôle de guerre, 1er février 1940,” [in:] J.-P. Sartre, Les Mots et autres écrits autobiographiques, Gallimard, Paris: 462–473.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre J.-P., Gerassi J. (2009), Talking with Sartre. Conversations and Debates, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
View in Google Scholar

Schraube E. (2013), “First-Person Perspective and Sociomaterial Decentering: Studying Technology from the Standpoint of the Subject,” Subjectivity 6 (1): 12–32.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.28

Seebohm T.M. (2002), “The Phenomenological Movement: A Tradition without Method? Merleau-Ponty and Husserl”, [in:] Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl, T. Toadvine, L. Embree (eds.), Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht: 51–71.
View in Google Scholar

Shapiro L. (2011), Embodied Cognition, Routledge Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Shapiro L. (2014), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, Routledge, Milton Park.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775845

Silverman D. (2018), “Bodily Skill and Internal Representation in Sensorimotor Perception,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (1): 157–173.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9503-5

Smith D.W. (2013), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/ [Accessed 22.05.2020].
View in Google Scholar

Smith M.B. (1993), The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
View in Google Scholar

Steward J. (1998), The Debate Between Sartre and Merleau-Ponty, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
View in Google Scholar

Thompson E. (1995), Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception, Routledge Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Thompson E. (2001), Between Ourselves: Second Person Issues in the Study of Consciousness, Imprint Academic, Thorverton.
View in Google Scholar

Thompson E., Noë A. (2002), Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, MIT Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Thompson E., Varela F. (2001), “Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10): 418–425.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2

Thompson E., Varela F., Rosch E. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, MIT Press, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001

Toadvine T.A. (1997), “The Art of Doubting. Merleau-Ponty and Cézanne,” Philosophy Today 41 (4): 545–553.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199741452

Ward D., Silverman D., Villalobos M. (2017), “Introduction: The Varieties of Enactivism,” Topoi 36 (3): 365–375.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6

Williford K. (2011), “Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness and the Autobiographical Ego,” [in:] Reading Sartre. On phenomenology and Existentialism, J. Webber (ed.), Routledge, London, New York: 195–211.
View in Google Scholar

Wilson M. (2002), “Six Views of Embodied Cognition,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 625–636.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

Wolff E. (1955), “Conscience et Liberté chez Descartes et chez M. Sartre,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 145: 341–348.
View in Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (1999), Self-Awareness and Alterity. A Phenomenological Investigation, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
View in Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2000), Exploring the Self. Philosophical and Psychopathological Perspectives on Self-Experience, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.23

Zahavi D. (2001), Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity, Ohio University Press, Athens.
View in Google Scholar

Zahavi D. (2005), Subjectivity and Selfhood Investigating the First-Person Perspective, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6541.001.0001

Zahavi D. (2006), “Thinking about (Self-)Consciousness: Phenomenological Perspectives,” [in:] Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness, U. Krieger, K. Williford (eds.), MIT Press, Massachusetts: 273–295.
View in Google Scholar