In Defense of Brain Death: Replies to Don Marquis, Michael Nair-Collins, Doyen Nguyen, and Laura Specker Sullivan

Article Sidebar

PDF Full text
Published: Mar 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1177
Keywords:
death definition of death brain death persons and death irreversibility and death organic integration decapitation and death social construction of death

Main Article Content

John P. Lizza
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

In this paper, I defend brain death as a criterion for determining death against objections raised by Don Marquis, Michael Nair-Collins, Doyen Nguyen, and Laura Specker Sullivan. I argue that any definition of death for beings like us relies on some sortal concept by which we are individuated and identified and that the choice of that concept in a practical context is not determined by strictly biological considerations but involves metaphysical, moral, social, and cultural considerations. This view supports acceptance of a more pluralistic legal definition of death as well as acceptance of brain death as death.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lizza, John P. 2018. “In Defense of Brain Death: Replies to Don Marquis, Michael Nair-Collins, Doyen Nguyen, and Laura Specker Sullivan”. Diametros 55 (55):68-90. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1177.
Issue
No. 55 (2018)
Section
Special Topic – Defining Death: Beyond Biology

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.

Creative Commons License

Author Biography

John P. Lizza, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania

John P. Lizza, Ph.D.Kutztown University of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Philosophy15200 Kutztown RoadKutztown, PA 19530USAE-mail: lizza@kutztown.edu
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Baker L. (2000), Persons and Bodies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J. (2006), “Are Organ Donors after Cardiac Death Really Dead?” Journal of Clinical Ethics 17 (2): 122–132.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J. (2007), “How Do Physicians Prove Irreversibility in the Determination of Death?” [in:] The signs of death, M. Sanchez Sorondo (ed), Proceedings of the Working Group September 11–12, 2006 (Scripta Varia 110), Vatican City, Pontificia Academia Scientiarum.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J. (2010a), “How the Distinction between ‘Irreversible’ and ‘Permanent’ Illuminates Circulatory–Respiratory Death Determination,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3): 242–255.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J. (2010b), “Point: Are Donors After Circulatory Death Really Dead, and Does It Matter? Yes and Yes,” Chest 138 (1): 13–16.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J. (2010c), “Rebuttal,” Chest 138 (1): 18–19.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J., Capron A., Bleck T., Blosser S., Bratton S., Childress J., DeVita M., Fulda G., Gries C., Mathur M., Nakagawa T., Rushton C., Shemie S., White D. (2010), “The Circulatory–Respiratory Determination of Death in Organ Donation,” Critical Care Medicine 38 (3): 963–970.
View in Google Scholar

Cole D. (1992), “The Reversibility of Death,” Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1): 26–30.
View in Google Scholar

Condic M.L. (2016), “Determination of Death: A Scientific Perspective on Biological Integration,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 257–278.
View in Google Scholar

Cruzan, Nancy Beth, by her Parents and Co-Guardians, Lester L. Cruzan et ux. v. Director, Missouri Department of Health et al., 497 US 26, 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Brennan S., Delgado R. (1981), “Death: Multiple Standards or a Single Standard?” Southern California Law Review 54: 1323–1355.
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin R.B. (1973), “Death in Context,” Indiana Law Journal 48: 623–639.
View in Google Scholar

Fost N. (1999), “The Unimportance of Death,” [in:] The Definition of Death. Contemporary Controversies, S. Youngner, R. Arnold, R. Schapiro (eds), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
View in Google Scholar

Gert B., Culver C.M., Clouser K.D. (2006), Bioethics: A Systematic Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Gervais K. (1986), Redefining Death, Yale University Press, New Haven.
View in Google Scholar

Green M., Wikler D. (1980), “Brain Death and Personal Identity,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2): 105–133.
View in Google Scholar

Lamb D. (1992), “Reversibility and Death: A Reply to David J. Cole,” Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1): 31–33.
View in Google Scholar

Lock M. (2002), Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death, University of California Press, Berkeley.
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2005), “Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1): 45–64.
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2006), Persons, Humanity, and the Definition of Death, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2007), “Potentiality and Human Embryos,” Bioethics 21 (7): 379–385. Reprinted (2012) [in:] Arguing About Bioethics, S. Holland (ed), Routledge, New York (NY).
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2011), “Where’s Waldo? The ‘Decapitation Gambit’ and the Definition of Death,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12): 743–746.
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2014), “On the Ethical Relevance of Active versus Passive Potentiality,” [in:] Potentiality: Metaphysical and Bioethical Dimensions, J.P. Lizza (ed), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD): 250–269.
View in Google Scholar

Marquis D. (2010), “Are DCD Donors Dead?” Hastings Center Report 40 (3): 24–31.
View in Google Scholar

Marquis D. (2018), “Death is Biological Phenomenon,” Diametros 55: 20–26.
View in Google Scholar

Miller F., Truog R. (2008), “Rethinking the Ethics of Vital Organ Donation,” Hastings Center Report 38 (6): 38–46.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2018), “A Biological Theory of Death: Characterization, Justification, and Implications,” Diametros 55: 27–43.
View in Google Scholar

Nguyen D. (2018), “A Holistic Understanding of Death: Ontological and Medical Considerations,” Diametros 55: 44–62.
View in Google Scholar

President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981), Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

President’s Council on Bioethics (2008), Controversies in the Determination of Death: A White Paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

Schechtman M. (2014), Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical concerns, and the Unity of a Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2004), “The Dead Donor Rule: Lessons from Linguistics,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3): 277–300.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2010), “Constructing the Death Elephant: A Synthetic Paradigm Shift for the Definition, Criteria, and Tests for Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3): 256–298.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2012), “You Only Die Once: Why Brain Death is not the Death of a Human Being; A Reply to Nicholas Tonti-Filippini,” Communio 39: 422–494.
View in Google Scholar

Specker Sullivan L. (2018), “What Does a Definition of Death Do?” Diametros 55: 63–67.
View in Google Scholar

Taylor P.W. (1981), “The Ethics of Respect for Nature,” Environmental Ethics 3 (3): 197–218.
View in Google Scholar

Tomlinson T. (2014), “The Irreversibility of Death: Metaphysical, Physiological, Medical or Ethical?” [in:] Potentiality: Metaphysical and Bioethical Dimensions, J.P. Lizza (ed), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD): 237–249.
View in Google Scholar

Veatch R.M. (1993), “The Impending Collapse of the Whole-Brain Definition of Death,” Hastings Center Report 23 (4): 18–24.
View in Google Scholar

Veatch R.M. (1999), “The Conscience Clause: How Much Individual Choice in Defining Death Can Our Society Tolerate?” [in:] The Definition of Death, S. Youngner, R. Arnold, R. Schapiro (eds), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
View in Google Scholar

Veatch R.M. (2015), “Killing by Organ Procurement: Brain–Based Death and Legal Fictions,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (3): 289–311.
View in Google Scholar

Warren M. (1973), “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,” The Monist 57 (1): 43–61.
View in Google Scholar

White R.J., Wolin L.R., Masopust L., Taslitz N., Verdura J. (1971), “Cephalic Exchange Transplantation in the Monkey,” Surgery 70 (1): 135–139.
View in Google Scholar

Wiggins D. (1980), Sameness and Substance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
View in Google Scholar

Wiggins D. (2001), Sameness and Substance Renewed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).
View in Google Scholar

Wiggins D. (2016), Continuants. Their Activity, Their Being, and Their Identity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar