The Debate on Depression. Can Phenomenologically-Oriented Philosophy of Psychiatry Combat the Problems of Reductionist Psychiatry?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of my paper is to review the discussion concerning various difficulties which surround the definition of depression and the methods of diagnosing and treating the disease against the background of the now dominant reductionist paradigm in psychiatry, as well as to answer the question whether a new approach to psychiatric disorders proposed by philosophers of psychiatry working within the phenomenologically inspired embodied and enactive paradigm indeed offers a solution to these difficulties. I present the issues specific to the subject of depression in light of the more general problems related to biological psychiatry that have recently caused much debate. In the second part of the paper, I consider enactive, phenomenological and embodied theories of depression and the possibilities of new methods of treatment. My goal is to assess whether these theories indeed add anything important to the conceptions that are already present in psychiatry. I conclude that even if the embodied philosophy of psychiatry does not solve many of the problems faced by modern psychiatry, it can, nevertheless, provide a useful theoretical basis for future changes.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Aho K.A. (2013), Depression and embodiment: Phenomenological reflections on motility, affectivity and transcendence, „Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy” 16 (4): 751–759.
View in Google Scholar
Angell M. (2011), The epidemic of mental illness: Why?, „The New York Review of Books” July 23.
View in Google Scholar
Bening T.B. (2015), Limitations of the biopsychosocial model in psychiatry, „Advanced Medical Education Practice” 6: 347–352.
View in Google Scholar
Borrell-Carrió F., Suchman A.L., Epstein R.M. (2004), The biopsychosocial model 25 years late: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry, „The Annals of Family Medicine” 2 (6): 576–582.
View in Google Scholar
Bracken P., Thomas P. (2001), Postpsychiatry: a new direction for mental health, „British Medical Journal” 322 (7288): 724–727.
View in Google Scholar
Caspi A., Houts R., Belsky D., Goldman-Mellor S., Harrington H., Israel S., Meier M., Ramrakha S., Shalev I., Poulton R., Moffi ti T. (2014), The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?, „Clinical Psychological Science” 2: 119–137.
View in Google Scholar
Cipriani A., Furukawa T.A., Salanti G., Chaimani A., Atkinson L.Z., Ogawa Y., Leucht S., Ruhe H.G., Turner E.H., Higgins J.P.T., Egger M., Takeshima N., Hayasaka Y., Imai H., Shinohara K., Tajika A., Joannidis J.P.A., Geddes J.R. (2018), Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, „The Lancet” 391: 1357–1366.
View in Google Scholar
Colombetti G. (2013), Psychopathology and the Enactive Mind, [w:] Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry, K.W.M. Fulford, M. Davies, R. Gipps, S. Graham, J. Sadler, G. Stanghellini, T. Thornton (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Cramer O.J.A., Waldorp L.J., van der Maas H.L.J., Borsboom D. (2010), Comorbidity: A network perspective, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 33: 137–193.
View in Google Scholar
De Jaegher H., Di Paolo F. (2007), Participatory sene-making. An enactive approach to social cognition, „Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences” 6 (4): 485–507.
View in Google Scholar
Engel G.L. (1977), The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine, „Science” 196: 129–136.
View in Google Scholar
Frances A. (2013), Saving Normal: An Insider’s Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life, William Morrow, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Fried E.I., Nesse R. (2015), Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study, „Journal of Affective Disorders” 172: 96–102.
View in Google Scholar
Fried E.I., Borkulo C.D., Cramer A.O.J., Boschloo L., Schoevers R.A., Borsboom D. (2017), Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights, „Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology” 52 (1): 1–10.
View in Google Scholar
Fuchs T. (2005a), Corporealized and disembodied minds: a phenomenological view of the body in melancholia and schizophrenia, „Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology” 12 (2): 95–107.
View in Google Scholar
Fuchs T. (2005b), The phenomenology of the body, space and time in depression, „Comprendre” 15: 108–121.
View in Google Scholar
Fuchs T. (2009), Embodied cognitive neuroscience and its consequences for psychiatry, „Poesis Praxis” 6: 219–233.
View in Google Scholar
Fuchs T. (2013), Depression, Intercorporeality, and Interaffectivity, „Journal of Consciousness Studies” 20 (7–8): 219–238.
View in Google Scholar
Gallagher S. (2000), Philosophical conceptions of the self; implications for cognitive science, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 4 (1): 14–21.
View in Google Scholar
Gallagher S. (2005), How the body shapes the mind, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Ghaemi S.N. (2007), Feeling and Time: the Phenomenology of Mood Disorders, Depressive Realism and Existential Psychotherapy, „Schizophrenia Bulletin” 33 (1): 122–130.
View in Google Scholar
Ghaemi S.N. (2009), The rise and fall of the bio-psychosocial model, „British Journal of Psychiatry” 195 (1): 3–4.
View in Google Scholar
Ghaemi S.N. (2011), The Biopsychosocial Model in Psychiatry: A Critique, „Existenz” 6 (1): 1–8.
View in Google Scholar
Greenberg G. (2011), Manufacturing Depression: The Secret History of a Modern Disease, Simon&Schuster, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Hanna R., Thompson E. (2012), Problem umysł-ciało-ciało, tłum. Przemysław Nowakowski, „Avant” 3: 12–37. Oryg. 2003, The mind-body-body problem, „Theoria et Historia Scientiarum” 7: 23–42.
View in Google Scholar
Hyman S.E. (2007), Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V?, „Nature Reviews Neuroscience” 8 (9): 725–732.
View in Google Scholar
Insel T., Cuthbert B., Garvey M., Heinssen R., Pine D.S., Quinn K., Sanislow C., Wang P. (2010), Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework of research on mental disorders, „American Journal of Psychiatry” 167 (7): 748–751.
View in Google Scholar
Kendler K.S., Campbell J. (2009), Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: repositioning the mind-body problem, „Psychological Medicine” 39 (6): 881–887.
View in Google Scholar
Kirsch I. (2009), The Emperor’s New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressants Myth, Random House, London.
View in Google Scholar
Kleinman A., Estrin G.L., Usmani S., Chisholm D., Marquez P.V., Evans T.G., Saxena S. (2016), Time for mental health to come out of the shadows, „The Lancet” 387 (10035): 2274–2275.
View in Google Scholar
Kramer P. (2011), In Defense of Antidepressants, New York Times, July 10, SR1.
View in Google Scholar
Leitan N.D., Murray G. (2014), The mind-body relationship in psychotherapy: grounded cognition
View in Google Scholar
as an explanatory framework, „Frontiers in Psychology” 5: 472.
View in Google Scholar
Łoza B., Heitzman J., Kosmowski W. (2011), W kierunku nowej klasyfikacji zaburzeń psychicznych – opinie polskich psychiatrów dotyczące projektu ICD-11, „Psychiatria Polska” 45: 785–798.
View in Google Scholar
Maturana H., Varela F. (1992), The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Shambhala, Boston.
View in Google Scholar
Minkowski E. (1970), Lived Time: Phenomenological and Psychopathological Studies, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
View in Google Scholar
Moncrieff J. (2013), The Bitterest Pills: The Troubling Story of Antipsychotic Drugs, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills Basingstoke.
View in Google Scholar
NIMH, Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D), URL = https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00021528?order=1 [dostęp 09.02.2018].
View in Google Scholar
Noë A. (2004), Action in perception, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
View in Google Scholar
Pużyński S., Rybakowski J., Wciórka J. (2011), Psychiatria (wyd. 2), Elsevier, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar
Ratcliffe M. (2008), Feelings of Being, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Ratcliffe M. (2012), Varieties of Temporal Experience in Depression, „The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 37 (2): 114–138.
View in Google Scholar
Ratcliffe M. (2015), Experiences of Depression: A Study in Phenomenology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Röhricht F. (2009), Body oriented psychotherapy – the state of the art in empirical research and evidence based practice: a clinical perspective, „Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy. An International Journal for Theory, Research and Practice” 4 (2): 135–156.
View in Google Scholar
Röhricht F., Gallagher S., Geuter U., Hutto D. (2014), Embodied cognition and body psychotherapy, „Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain and Culture” 10: 11–20.
View in Google Scholar
Sass L.A., Parnas J., Zahavi D. (2011), Phenomenological Psychopathology and Schizophrenia: Contemporary Approaches and Misunderstandings, „Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology” 18 (1): 1–23.
View in Google Scholar
Seikkula J., Olson M.E. (2003), The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: its poetics and micropolitics, „Family Process Journal” 42: 403–418.
View in Google Scholar
Shorter E. (2015), The history of nosology and the rise of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, „Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience” 17 (1): 59–67.
View in Google Scholar
Stephan K.E., Bach D.R., Fletcher P.C., Flint J., Frank M.J., Friston K.J., Heinz A., Huys Q.J.M., Owen M.J., Bidner E.B., Dayan P., Johnstone E.C., Meyer-Lindberg A., Montague P.R., Schnyder U., Wang X.J., Breakspear M. (2016a), Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis, „Lancet Psychiatry” 3 (1): 77–83.
View in Google Scholar
Stephan K.E., Bach D.R., Fletcher P.C., Flint J., Frank M.J., Friston K.J., Heinz A., Huys Q.J.M, Owen M.J., Bidner E.B., Dayan P., Johnstone E.C., Meyer-Lindberg A., Montague P.R., Schnyder U., Wang X.J., Breakspear M. (2016b), Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 2: pathogenesis and aetiology, „Lancet Psychiatry” 3 (1): 84–90.
View in Google Scholar
Tsakiris M., Schutz-Bosbach S., Gallagher S. (2007), On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections, „Consciousness and Cognition” 16 (3): 645–660.
View in Google Scholar
Uher R., Payne J.L., Pavlova B., Perlis R.H. (2014), Major depressive disorder in DSM-5: implications for clinical practice and research of changes from DSM-IV, „Depress Anxiety” 31 (6): 459–471.
View in Google Scholar
Varela F., Thomspon E., Rosch E. (1991), The Embodied Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Vos T. et al. (2015), Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015, „The Lancet” 388: 1545–1602.
View in Google Scholar
Wakefield J., First M., (2012), Fallacious reasoning in the argument to eliminate the major depression bereavement exclusion in DSM-5, „World Psychiatry” 11 (3): 204–205.
View in Google Scholar
Woodward J. (2003), Making Things Happen, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar