Can a Daoist Sage Have Close Relationships with Other Human Beings?
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores the compatibility between the Daoist art of emptying one’s heart-mind (which is the key element of the identity of a Daoist sage) and the art of creating close relationships. The fact that a Daoist sage is characterized by an empty heart-mind makes him somewhat different from an average human being: since a full heart-mind is characteristic of the human condition, the sage transcends what makes us human. This could alienate him from others and make him incapable of developing close relationships. The research goal of this paper is to investigate whether – in spite of being an unusual human being – a Daoist sage has the abilities necessary for creating close bonds with others.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Aristotle (2011), Nicomachean Ethics, trans. R.C. Bartlett, S.D. Collins, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (IL).
View in Google Scholar
Baier A. (1986), “Trust and Antitrust,” Ethics 96 (2): 231–260.
View in Google Scholar
Beauvoir S. de (2012a), Le deuxieme sexe I, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
Beauvoir S. de (2012b), Le deuxieme sexe II, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
Blakeley D.N. (2008), “Hearts in Agreement: Zhuangzi on Dao Adept Friendship,” Philosophy East & West 58 (3): 318–336.
View in Google Scholar
Chan W-t. (1973), Comment, [in:] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, trans. and compil. W-t. Chan, Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ): 186.
View in Google Scholar
Chen L.K., Sung H.C.W. (2015), The Doctrines and Transformation of the Huang-Lao Tradition, [in:] Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, X. Liu (ed.), Springer, New York (NY): 241–264.
View in Google Scholar
Chong K-ch. (2010), “Zhuangzi and Hui Shi on Qing,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 40 (1): 21–45.
View in Google Scholar
Cline E.M. (2008), “Mirrors, Minds, and Metaphors,” Philosophy East & West 58 (3): 337–357.
View in Google Scholar
Cua A. (1977), “Forgetting Morality: Reflections on a Theme in Chuang Tzu,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 4 (4): 305–328.
View in Google Scholar
Dull C.J. (2012), “Zhuangzi and Thoreau: Wandering, Nature, and Freedom,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (2): 222–239.
View in Google Scholar
Ebels-Duggan K. (2008), “Against Beneficence: A Normative Account of Love,” Ethics 119 (1): 142–170.
View in Google Scholar
Fraser C. (2014), “Wandering the Way: A Eudaimonistic Approach to the Zhuāngzǐ,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (4): 541–565.
View in Google Scholar
Geaney J. (2012), On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu (HI).
View in Google Scholar
Graham A.C. (1989), Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
View in Google Scholar
Hawley K. (2014), “Trust, Distrust and Commitment,” Nous 48 (1): 1–20.
View in Google Scholar
Heitz M. (2007), “Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Meister Eckhart and Zhuangzi on the Breakthrough,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (1): 53–61.
View in Google Scholar
Heyman S.J. (2008), Free Speech and Human Dignity, Yale University Press, New Haven (CT).
View in Google Scholar
Holton R. (1994), “Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1): 63–76.
View in Google Scholar
Huang Y. (2010), “The Ethics of Difference in the Zhuangzi,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (1): 65–99.
View in Google Scholar
Iwanowska J. (2016), “The Ethical Importance of Close Relationships,” Etyka 52: 9–30.
View in Google Scholar
Jackson F. (1991), “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection,” Ethics 101 (3): 474-475.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1991), Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
LaFollette H. (1996), Personal Relationships: Love, Identity, and Morality, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Laozi (2007), Daodejing: A Complete Translation and Commentary, trans. H-G. Möller, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
View in Google Scholar
Lee J.H. (2014), The Ethical Foundations of Early Daoism: Zhuangzi’s Unique Moral Vision, Palgrave Macmillan, New York (NY).
View in Google Scholar
Lenehan K. (2013), “Theory of Non-Emotion in the Zhuangzi and Its Connection to Wei-Jin Poetry,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (2): 340–354.
View in Google Scholar
Liu X. (2015), Zhuangzi’s Philosophy: A Three Dimensional Reconstruction, [in:] Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, X. Liu (ed.), Springer, New York (NY): 193–220.
View in Google Scholar
Mair V. (1994), Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu, Bantam Books, New York (NY).
View in Google Scholar
Mair V. (2014), Heart-mind, [in:] Language Log, URL = http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=14807 (Accessed 20.11.2016)
View in Google Scholar
Machek D. (2015a), “’Emotions that do not move’: Zhuangzi and Stoics on Self-Emerging Feelings,” Dao: Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (4): 521–544.
View in Google Scholar
Machek D. (2015b), Virtuosos of the Ordinary: Comparative Interpretations of Daoist and Stoic Thought, doctoral dissertation, Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto.
View in Google Scholar
Matthews S., Kennett J. (2012), “Truth, Lies, and the Narrative Self,” American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4): 301–315.
View in Google Scholar
Misiuna B. (2004), “Afirmacja świata i życia w filozofii taoizmu,” Etyka 37: 173–193.
View in Google Scholar
Møllgaard E. (2007), An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
Möller H.G. (2006a), Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
View in Google Scholar
Möller H.G. (2006b), The Philosophy of the Daodejing, Columbia University Press, New York (NY).
View in Google Scholar
Nozick R. (1999), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Plato (2004), Gorgias, trans. W. Hamilton, C. Emlyn-Jones, Penguin Classics, London.
View in Google Scholar
Qian Z. (1998), The Sage Does Not Experience Emotion, trans. R. Egan, [in:] Z. Qian, Limited Views: Essays on Ideas and Letters, Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge (MA).
View in Google Scholar
Robinet I. (1997), Taoism: Growth of a Religion, trans. P. Brooks, Standford University Press, Stanford (CA).
View in Google Scholar
Roth H. (2003), Bimodal Mystical Experience in the Qiwulun Chapter of the Zhuangzi, [in:] Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses on the Zhuangzi, S. Cook (ed.), SUNY Press, New York (NY): 15–32.
View in Google Scholar
Simpson T.W. (2012), “What is Trust?,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4): 550–569.
View in Google Scholar
Slingerland E. (2003), Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Soble A. (1997), Irreplaceability, [in:] Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love 1977–1992, A. Soble (ed.), Rodopi, Atlanta (GA): 355–357.
View in Google Scholar
Velleman D. (1999), “Love as a Moral Emotion,” Ethics 109 (2): 338–374.
View in Google Scholar
Wagner R.G. (2000), The Craft of a Chinese Commentator: Wang Bi on the Laozi, SUNY Press, Albany (NY).
View in Google Scholar
Wang Y. (2000), “Philosophy of Change and the Deconstruction of Self in the Zhuangzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27 (1): 345–360.
View in Google Scholar
Ward J.K. (2006), Reciprocity and Friendship in Beauvoir’s Thought, [in:] The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical Essays, M.A. Simmons (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington (IN): 146–162.
View in Google Scholar
Williams G. (2013), “Sharing Responsibility and Holding Responsible,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (4): 351–364.
View in Google Scholar
Yijie T. (2015), Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Christianity and Chinese Culture, China Academic Library, Springer, New York (NY).
View in Google Scholar
Yijie T. (2003), “Emotion in Pre-Qin Ruist Moral Theory: An Explanation of ‘Dao begins in Qing’,” trans. B. Bruya, H-m. Wen, Philosophy East & West 53 (2): 271–281.
View in Google Scholar
Zhuangzi (2009), Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections from Traditional Commentaries, trans. B. Ziporyn, Hackett, Indianapolis (IN).
View in Google Scholar
Zhuangzi (1891), Zhuangzi, trans. J. Legge, [in:] The Chinese Text Project, URL = http://ctext.org/zhuangzi (Accessed 22.11.2016).
View in Google Scholar
Ziporyn B. (2009), Glossary of Essentials Terms, [in:] Zhuangzi, Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries, trans. B. Ziporyn, Hackett, Indianapolis (IN): 213–220.
View in Google Scholar