Can a Daoist Sage Have Close Relationships with Other Human Beings?
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores the compatibility between the Daoist art of emptying one’s heart-mind (which is the key element of the identity of a Daoist sage) and the art of creating close relationships. The fact that a Daoist sage is characterized by an empty heart-mind makes him somewhat different from an average human being: since a full heart-mind is characteristic of the human condition, the sage transcends what makes us human. This could alienate him from others and make him incapable of developing close relationships. The research goal of this paper is to investigate whether – in spite of being an unusual human being – a Daoist sage has the abilities necessary for creating close bonds with others.
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Aristotle (2011), Nicomachean Ethics, trans. R.C. Bartlett, S.D. Collins, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (IL).
Baier A. (1986), “Trust and Antitrust,” Ethics 96 (2): 231–260.
Beauvoir S. de (2012a), Le deuxieme sexe I, Gallimard, Paris.
Beauvoir S. de (2012b), Le deuxieme sexe II, Gallimard, Paris.
Blakeley D.N. (2008), “Hearts in Agreement: Zhuangzi on Dao Adept Friendship,” Philosophy East & West 58 (3): 318–336.
Chan W-t. (1973), Comment, [in:] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, trans. and compil. W-t. Chan, Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ): 186.
Chen L.K., Sung H.C.W. (2015), The Doctrines and Transformation of the Huang-Lao Tradition, [in:] Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, X. Liu (ed.), Springer, New York (NY): 241–264.
Chong K-ch. (2010), “Zhuangzi and Hui Shi on Qing,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 40 (1): 21–45.
Cline E.M. (2008), “Mirrors, Minds, and Metaphors,” Philosophy East & West 58 (3): 337–357.
Cua A. (1977), “Forgetting Morality: Reflections on a Theme in Chuang Tzu,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 4 (4): 305–328.
Dull C.J. (2012), “Zhuangzi and Thoreau: Wandering, Nature, and Freedom,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (2): 222–239.
Ebels-Duggan K. (2008), “Against Beneficence: A Normative Account of Love,” Ethics 119 (1): 142–170.
Fraser C. (2014), “Wandering the Way: A Eudaimonistic Approach to the Zhuāngzǐ,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (4): 541–565.
Geaney J. (2012), On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu (HI).
Graham A.C. (1989), Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
Hawley K. (2014), “Trust, Distrust and Commitment,” Nous 48 (1): 1–20.
Heitz M. (2007), “Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Meister Eckhart and Zhuangzi on the Breakthrough,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (1): 53–61.
Heyman S.J. (2008), Free Speech and Human Dignity, Yale University Press, New Haven (CT).
Holton R. (1994), “Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1): 63–76.
Huang Y. (2010), “The Ethics of Difference in the Zhuangzi,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (1): 65–99.
Iwanowska J. (2016), “The Ethical Importance of Close Relationships,” Etyka 52: 9–30.
Jackson F. (1991), “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection,” Ethics 101 (3): 474-475.
Kant I. (1991), Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
LaFollette H. (1996), Personal Relationships: Love, Identity, and Morality, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Laozi (2007), Daodejing: A Complete Translation and Commentary, trans. H-G. Möller, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
Lee J.H. (2014), The Ethical Foundations of Early Daoism: Zhuangzi’s Unique Moral Vision, Palgrave Macmillan, New York (NY).
Lenehan K. (2013), “Theory of Non-Emotion in the Zhuangzi and Its Connection to Wei-Jin Poetry,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (2): 340–354.
Liu X. (2015), Zhuangzi’s Philosophy: A Three Dimensional Reconstruction, [in:] Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, X. Liu (ed.), Springer, New York (NY): 193–220.
Mair V. (1994), Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu, Bantam Books, New York (NY).
Mair V. (2014), Heart-mind, [in:] Language Log, URL = http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=14807 (Accessed 20.11.2016)
Machek D. (2015a), “’Emotions that do not move’: Zhuangzi and Stoics on Self-Emerging Feelings,” Dao: Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (4): 521–544.
Machek D. (2015b), Virtuosos of the Ordinary: Comparative Interpretations of Daoist and Stoic Thought, doctoral dissertation, Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto.
Matthews S., Kennett J. (2012), “Truth, Lies, and the Narrative Self,” American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4): 301–315.
Misiuna B. (2004), “Afirmacja świata i życia w filozofii taoizmu,” Etyka 37: 173–193.
Møllgaard E. (2007), An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, Routledge, London.
Möller H.G. (2006a), Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory, Open Court, Chicago (IL).
Möller H.G. (2006b), The Philosophy of the Daodejing, Columbia University Press, New York (NY).
Nozick R. (1999), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Plato (2004), Gorgias, trans. W. Hamilton, C. Emlyn-Jones, Penguin Classics, London.
Qian Z. (1998), The Sage Does Not Experience Emotion, trans. R. Egan, [in:] Z. Qian, Limited Views: Essays on Ideas and Letters, Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge (MA).
Robinet I. (1997), Taoism: Growth of a Religion, trans. P. Brooks, Standford University Press, Stanford (CA).
Roth H. (2003), Bimodal Mystical Experience in the Qiwulun Chapter of the Zhuangzi, [in:] Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses on the Zhuangzi, S. Cook (ed.), SUNY Press, New York (NY): 15–32.
Simpson T.W. (2012), “What is Trust?,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4): 550–569.
Slingerland E. (2003), Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Soble A. (1997), Irreplaceability, [in:] Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love 1977–1992, A. Soble (ed.), Rodopi, Atlanta (GA): 355–357.
Velleman D. (1999), “Love as a Moral Emotion,” Ethics 109 (2): 338–374.
Wagner R.G. (2000), The Craft of a Chinese Commentator: Wang Bi on the Laozi, SUNY Press, Albany (NY).
Wang Y. (2000), “Philosophy of Change and the Deconstruction of Self in the Zhuangzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27 (1): 345–360.
Ward J.K. (2006), Reciprocity and Friendship in Beauvoir’s Thought, [in:] The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical Essays, M.A. Simmons (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington (IN): 146–162.
Williams G. (2013), “Sharing Responsibility and Holding Responsible,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (4): 351–364.
Yijie T. (2015), Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Christianity and Chinese Culture, China Academic Library, Springer, New York (NY).
Yijie T. (2003), “Emotion in Pre-Qin Ruist Moral Theory: An Explanation of ‘Dao begins in Qing’,” trans. B. Bruya, H-m. Wen, Philosophy East & West 53 (2): 271–281.
Zhuangzi (2009), Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections from Traditional Commentaries, trans. B. Ziporyn, Hackett, Indianapolis (IN).
Zhuangzi (1891), Zhuangzi, trans. J. Legge, [in:] The Chinese Text Project, URL = http://ctext.org/zhuangzi (Accessed 22.11.2016).
Ziporyn B. (2009), Glossary of Essentials Terms, [in:] Zhuangzi, Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries, trans. B. Ziporyn, Hackett, Indianapolis (IN): 213–220.