Artificial Wombs, Thomson and Abortion – What Might Change?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ectogenesis (artificial wombs) might soon become a reality. This paper will analyse how the development of such technologies will affect Judith Jarvis Thomson’s defence of abortion, and what the potential consequences of this will be for society. Thomson attempts to justify abortion by appealing to the mother’s right to bodily autonomy. We will argue that once these technologies have been developed, the right to abortion can no longer be justified by such appeals. As a result, when justifying abortion, Thomson-style arguments will no longer work, and a very different strategy will have to be adopted by those wishing to justify its permissibility. Anticipating a consequent weaker position of the pro-choice view, we briefly consider some of the practical implications of ectogenesis for society: effects on parental dynamics, governmental expenditure, research, and gender equality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Adams S. (2021), “Surge in 999 Calls Over at Home Abortions After NHS Controversially Started Sending Powerful Pills by Post,” URL = https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958219/Surge-999-calls-home-abortions.html [Accessed 06.09.2021].
Barraclough C. (2017), “Piecing Together the Pain of Loss for Men After Abortion,” URL = https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/corrine-barraclough-piecing-together-the-pain-of-loss-for-men-after-abortion/news-story/b9aed53e9a1977b0496633a669ee14f1 [Accessed 10.03.2019].
Blackshaw B.P., Rodger D. (2019), “Ectogenesis and the Case Against the Right to the Death of the Foetus,” Bioethics 33 (1): 76–81.
Bostrom N. (2005), “Transhumanist Values,” Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Issue Supplement, Ethical Issues for the Twenty-First Century): 3–14.
Brake E. (2005), “Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1): 55–73.
Britannica (n.d.), “Patria Potestas (Roman Law),” URL = https://www.britannica.com/topic/patria-potestas [Accessed 11.06.2022].
Cable A. (2018), “The Tiniest Survivor: How the ‘Miracle’ Baby Born Two Weeks Before the Legal Abortion Limit Clung to Life Against all Odds,” URL = https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1021034/The-tiniest-survivor-How-miracle-baby-born-weeks-legal-abortion-limit-clung-life-odds.html [Accessed 07.03.2019].
Camosy C.C. (2022), “The Right to a Dead Baby? Abortion, Ableism, and the Question of Autonomy,” URL = https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2022/04/81840/ [Accessed 10.06.2022].
Cha A.E., Wax-Thibodeaux E. (2019), “Man Allowed to Sue Abortion Clinic on Behalf of Unborn Foetus ‘For First Time in US History’,” URL = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/alabama-abortion-lawsuit-foetus-girlfriend-madison-county-a8811576.html [Accessed 08.06.2019].
Cohen I.G. (2008), “The Right Not to Be a Genetic Parent?,” Southern California Law Review 81 (6): 1115–1196.
Colgrove N. (2019), “Subjects of Ectogenesis: Are ‘Gestatelings’ Fetuses, Newborns or Neither?,” Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11): 723–726.
Crary D. (2017), “As Number of Adoptions Drops, Many US Agencies Face Strains,” URL = https://apnews.com/article/b9f77e34d24c4303af5d601d960dd661 [Accessed 11.06.2022].
Delhove J., Osenk I., Prichard I., Donnelley M. (2020), “Public Acceptability of Gene Therapy and Gene Editing for Human Use: A Systematic Review,” Human Gene Therapy 31 (1–2): 20–46.
Department of Health & Social Care (2018), “Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2017,” URL = https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/763174/2017-abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-revised.pdf [Accessed 02.05.2020].
Department of Work & Pensions (2022), “Child Maintenance Service Statistics: Data to December 2021 (Experimental),” URL = https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/child-maintenance-service-statistics-data-to-december-2021-experimental [Accessed 12.08.2022].
Di Nucci E. (2014), “Fathers and Abortion,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 39 (4): 444–458.
Eberl J.T. (2020), The Nature of Human Persons: Metaphysics and Bioethics (1st edition), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Furedi A. (2008), “Are There Too Many Abortions?,” Abortion Review, special edition 2 (Abortion and Women’s Lives): 3–7.
Gelfand S., Shook J.R. (2006), Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Harris G.W. (1986), “Fathers and Fetuses,” Ethics 96 (3): 594–603.
Howard J. (2017), “Born Before 22 Weeks, ‘Most Premature’ Baby is Now Thriving,” URL = https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/08/health/premature-baby-21-weeks-survivor-profile/index.html [Accessed 12.08.2022].
Huxley A. (2008), Brave New World (media tie-in edition), Vintage Digital, London.
Kaczor C. (2018), “Ectogenesis and a Right to the Death of the Prenatal Human Being:
A Reply to Räsänen,” Bioethics 32 (9): 634–638.
Kaplanoglu M., Bulbul M., Kaplanoglu D., Bakacak S.M. (2015), “Effect of Multiple Repeat Cesarean Sections on Maternal Morbidity: Data from Southeast Turkey,” Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 21: 1447–1453.
Kendal E. (2015), “Promoting Equal Opportunity Through Ectogenesis,” [in:] Equal Opportunity and the Case for State Sponsored Ectogenesis, E. Kendal (ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, London: 43–61.
Khazan O. (2021), “The New Question Haunting Adoption,” URL = https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/10/adopt-baby-cost-process-hard/620258/ [Accessed 11.06.2022].
Kingma E., Finn S. (2020), “Neonatal Incubator or Artificial Womb? Distinguishing Ectogestation and Ectogenesis Using the Metaphysics of Pregnancy,” Bioethics 34 (4): 354–363.
Mackenzie C. (1992), “Abortion and Embodiment,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (2): 136–155.
Marie Stopes AU (2016), “Understanding your options: surgical abortion vs medical abortion,” URL = https://www.mariestopes.org.au/your-choices/surgical-abortion-vs-medical-abortion/ [Accessed 10.06.2022].
Mathison E., Davis J. (2017), “Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?,” Bioethics 31 (4): 313–320.
McCaig C.D., Rajnicek A., Song B., Zhao M. (2005), “Controlling Cell Behavior Electrically: Current Views and Future Potential,” Physiological Reviews 85 (3): 943–978.
McCulley M.G. (1998), “The Male Abortion: The Putative Father’s Right to Terminate His Interests in and Obligations to the Unborn Child,” Journal of Law and Policy 7 (1): 1–55.
Metelo-Coimbra C., Roncon-Albuquerque R. (2016), “Artificial Placenta: Recent Advances and Potential Clinical Applications,” Pediatric Pulmonology 51 (6): 643–649.
Mychaliska G. (2016), “The Artificial Placenta: Is Clinical Translation Next?,” Pediatric Pulmonology 51 (6): 557–559.
Neal M. (2019), “Conscientious Objection, ‘Proper Medical Treatment’, and Professionalism: The Limits of Accommodation for Conscience in Healthcare,” [in:] Religious Beliefs and Conscientious Exemptions in a Liberal State, J. Adenitire (ed.), Hart Publishing, Cambridge: 135–156.
NHS (2016), “Abortion: Risks,” URL = https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/abortion/risks/ [Accessed: 17.08.2016].
NHS (2020), “Abortion – What happens,” URL = https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/abortion/what-happens/ [Accessed: 10.06.2022].
NICE (2019), “Abortion Before 14 Weeks: Choosing Between Medical or Surgical Abortion – Decision Aid [part of NG 140]: Abortion Care,” URL = https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140/resources/abortion-before-14-weeks-choosing-between-medical-or-surgical-abortion-patient-decision-aid-pdf-6906582255 [Accessed: 11.06.2022].
NICE (2019), “Caesarean Section [CG132],” URL = https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/ifp/chapter/Risks-of-caesarean-section [Accessed 16.12.2019].
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2016), “Topic Summary: Artificial Wombs (Ectogenesis),” URL = http://nuffieldbioethics.org/future-work/future-work-topics-2015/topic-summary-artificial-wombs-ectogenesis [Accessed 07.03.2019].
Oderberg D.S. (2008), “The Metaphysical Status of the Embryo: Some Arguments Revisited,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4): 263–276.
Overall C. (2015), “Rethinking Abortion, Ectogenesis, and Fetal Death,” Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (1): 126–140.
Partridge E.A., Davey M.G., Hornick M.A., McGovern P.E., Mejaddam A.Y., Vrecenak J.D., Mesas-Burgos C., Olive A., Caskey R.C., Weiland T.R., Han J., Schupper A.J., Connelly J.T., Dysart K.C., Rychik J., Hedrick H.L., Peranteau W.H., Flake A.W. (2017), “An Extra-Uterine System to Physiologically Support the Extreme Premature Lamb,” Nature Communications 8: 15112.
Playford R.C. (2018), “Elective Abandonment: A Male Counterpart to Abortion,” The New Bioethics 24 (2): 122–134.
Pruski M. (2017), “The Relationship of Gametes to Those Who Procreate and Its Impact on Artificially Generated Gamete Technologies,” Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics 33 (1): 27–41.
Pruski M. (2019a), “Double Effect & Ectopic Pregnancy – Some Problems,” The Catholic Medical Quarterly 69 (2): 17–20.
Pruski M. (2019b), “What Demarks the Metamorphosis of Human Individuals to Posthuman Entities?,” The New Bioethics 25 (1): 3–23.
Pruski M., Hu L., Yang C., Wang Y., Zhang J.-B., Zhang L., Huang Y., Rajnicek A.M., St Clair D., McCaig C.D., Lang B., Ding Y.-Q. (2019), “Roles for IFT172 and Primary Cilia in Cell Migration, Cell Division, and Neocortex Development,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 7: 287.
Pruski M., Whitehouse D., Bow S. (2022), “The Right to Choose to Abort an Abortion: Should Pro-Choice Advocates Support Abortion Pill Reversal?,” The New Bioethics 28 (3): 252–267.
Räsänen J. (2017), “Ectogenesis, Abortion and a Right to the Death of the Fetus,” Bioethics 31 (9): 697–702.
Reader S. (2008), “Abortion, Killing, and Maternal Moral Authority,” Hypatia 23 (1): 132–149.
Rhonheimer M. (2009), Vital Conflicts in Medical Ethics: A Virtue Approach to Craniotomy and Tubal Pregnancies, Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C.
Rodger D., Colgrove N., Blackshaw B.P. (2021), “Gestaticide: Killing the Subject of the Artificial Womb,” Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12): e53.
Romanis E.C. (2018), “Artificial Womb Technology and the Frontiers of Human Reproduction: Conceptual Differences and Potential Implications,” Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11): 751–755.
Segers S. (2021), “The Path Toward Ectogenesis: Looking Beyond the Technical Challenges,” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 59.
Sheldon S. (2003), “Unwilling Fathers and Abortion: Terminating Men’s Child Support Obligations?,” Modern Law Review 66 (2): 175–194.
Singer P., Wells D. (1984), The Reproduction Revolution: New Ways of Making Babies, Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford.
Smikle C., Yarrarapu S.N.S., Khetarpal S. (2020), “Asherman Syndrome,” [in:] StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL).
Stevenson R. (2019), My Body My Choice: The Fight for Abortion Rights: 2 (illustrated edition), Orca Book Publishers, British Columbia.
Taylor G., Galichet C. (2021), “Current Capabilities for Human Genome Editing: Report for the WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing,” URL = https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1371696/retrieve [Accessed 11.06.2022].
Thomson J.J. (1971), “A Defense of Abortion,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (1): 47–66.
Warren M.A. (1973), “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,” The Monist 57 (1): 43–61.
Willmott C. (2022), “On the Scientific Plausibility of Transhumanism,” [in:] The Ethics of Generating Posthumans, C. MacKellar, T. Stammers (eds.), Bloomsbury Academic, London: 77–89.