William James’ Ideomotor Theory of Action (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Adriana Schetz

Abstract

The paper discusses the view of William James on the contribution of will to our decisions to act. According to James, our voluntary action, which for him is strongly connected with an intention to do something, occurs when the subject of the action knows its sensorimotor effects. An attempt has been made to defend James’ view and rebut popular criticisms aiming to undermine the role of knowledge in voluntary action. The paper also offers to identify a contemporary context for the ideomotor theory of action. It is argued that such a context is provided by the enactive theory of perception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Schetz, Adriana. 2015. “William James’ Ideomotor Theory of Action (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 43 (March):137-57. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.43.2015.721.
Section
Other articles
Author Biography

Adriana Schetz, University of Szczecin

Adriana Schetz, drInstitut of PhilosophyUniversity of Szczecinul. Krakowska 71-7671-017 SzczecinE-mail: adriana.schetz@gmail.com
Share |

References

Bauer [2005/2008] – J. Bauer, Empatia: Co potrafią lustrzane neurony, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Bertenthal, Longo [2008] – B.I. Bertenthal, M.R. Longo, Motor Knowledge and Action Understanding: A Developmental Perspective, [w:] Klatzky, MacWhinney, Behrmann (eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action: 34th Carnegie symposium on cognition, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2008, s. 323-368.
View in Google Scholar

Burkhardt, Bowers, Skorupskelis [1975–1988] – F.H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, I.K. Skorupskelis (eds.), The Works of William James, vol. 1–19, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/London 1988.
View in Google Scholar

Carpenter [1852] – W.B. Carpenter, On the Influence of Suggestion in Modifying and Directing Muscular Movement, Independently of Volition, “Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain” (March) 1852, s. 147–153; URL = http: //www.sgipt.org/medppp/ psymot/ carp1852.htm [26.06.2013].
View in Google Scholar

Damasio [1994/1999] – A. Damasio, Błąd Kartezjusza. Emocje, rozum i ludzki mózg, przeł. M. Karpiński, Rebis, Poznań 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Gallagher [2005] – S. Gallagher, How the Body Shapes the Mind, Clarnedon Press, Oxford 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Gibson [1979] – J.J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston 1979.
View in Google Scholar

Goren, Sarty, Wu [1975] – C.C. Goren, M. Sarty, P.Y.K. Wu, Visual Following and Pattern Discrimination of Face-Like Stimuli by Newborn Infants, „Pediatrics” (56/4) 1975, s. 544–549.
View in Google Scholar

Gray [1987] – J. Gray, The neuropsychology of anxiety, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
View in Google Scholar

Gutowski [2011] – P. Gutowski, Nauka, Filozofia i życie. U podstaw myśli Williama Jamesa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Hole, Bourne [2010] – G. Hole, V. Bourne, Face Processing: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Applied Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
View in Google Scholar

James [1890/1981] – W. James, The Principles of Psychology, Burkhardt, Bowers, Skorupskelis (eds.) [1975–1988], t. 1–3.
View in Google Scholar

James [1892/2002] – W. James, Psychologia. Kurs skrócony, przeł. M. Zagrodzki, PWN, Warszawa 2002.
View in Google Scholar

James [1892/1985] – W. James, Psychology (Briefer Course), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1985.
View in Google Scholar

Millner, Goodale [2006/2008] – A.D. Millner, M.A. Goodale, Mózg wzrokowy w działaniu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006/2008.
View in Google Scholar

Rolls [2005] – E. Rolls, Emotion explained, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Schetz [2012] – A. Schetz, Percepcja bez wrażeń zmysłowych. Nowa psychologia J.J. Gibsona, „Roczniki Psychologiczne” (1) 2012, s. 31–53.
View in Google Scholar

Schetz [2014] – A. Schetz, Minimalistyczny reprezentacjonizm ekologicznej teorii percepcji / Minimalist Representationalism of the Ecological Theory of Perception, „Roczniki Psychologiczne” / „Annals of Psychology” (17/1) 2014, s. 197–215.
View in Google Scholar

Schetz [2011] – D. Schetz, Hipotonia ortostatyczna i zespół zamknięcia a fizjologia świadomości, „Analiza i Egzystencja” (16) 2011, s. 41–49.
View in Google Scholar