Twenty Fregean Ways to Quantify Over Frege's Senses
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstrakt
This paper continues my discussion with Michael Dummett on Frege’s senses, published in The Philosophy of Michael Dummett and further developed in Diametros. In his reply to my original paper, Dummett came to agree with me that senses are neither objects nor functions, since they have a categorially different kind of linguistico-metaphysical function to perform. He then asks how we might quantify over senses, if they are neither objects nor functions. He discusses two main options, and finds one unviable and the other “very un-Fregean.” I then offer a Fregean or neo-Fregean option in my rejoinder. And I still hold that this way out will do the job, or is at least plausible enough that the burden of persuasion is on those who disagree. But I hope to show in this paper that on a more complete examination of Frege, there are at least twenty Fregean or neo-Fregean ways out, with the one I proposed being option (17).
Article Details
Numer
Dział
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Teksty zaproponowane do naszego czasopisma nie powinny być nigdzie publikowane przed ukazaniem się w „Diametros”. Wraz z przesłaniem swojego utworu redakcji autor akceptuje, że w momencie zakwalifikowania tekstu do publikacji czasopismo „Diametros” będzie stosowało licencję the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Na podstawie tej licencji autorzy zgadzają się, że ich prace mogą być zgodnie z prawem ponownie wykorzystywane do jakichkolwiek celów bez konieczności uzyskania uprzedniej zgody ze strony autora lub wydawcy. Każdy może prace te czytać, pobierać, kopiować, drukować, rozpowszechniać oraz przetwarzać, pod warunkiem poprawnego oznaczenia autorstwa oraz oryginalnego miejsca publikacji. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie do swoich utworów bez żadnych innych ograniczeń. Pełna informacja na temat licencji CC BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Jak cytować
Bibliografia
Butchvarov P. (1979), Being Qua Being: A Theory of Identity, Existence, and Predication, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Dejnožka J. (2015/2021), Bertrand Russell on Modality and Logical Relevance, 2d ed., CreateSpace, Ann Arbor (MI).
Dejnožka J. (2010), “Dummett’s Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism,” Diametros 25: 118–131.
Dejnožka J. (2007), “Dummett’s Backward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism,” [in:] The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, R.E. Auxier and L.E. Hahn (eds.), Open Court, Chicago: 55–113.
Dejnožka J. (1996/2003), The Ontology of the Analytic Tradition and Its Origins: Realism and Identity in Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, and Quine, Littlefield Adams, Lanham (MD).
Dejnožka J. (1987), “Dual Object Theories of Identity, Existence, and Modality,” faculty paper presented in Sampson Hall, The United States Naval Academy in 1987, URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334945593_Dual_Object_Theories_of_Identity_Existence_and_Modality [Accessed 05.03.2022].
Dejnožka J. (1982), “Frege: Existence Defined as Identifiability,” International Studies in Philosophy 14: 1–18.
Dejnožka J. (1981), “Frege on Identity,” International Studies in Philosophy 13 (1): 31–41.
Dejnožka J. (1979), Frege: Existence and Identity, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor (MI), doctoral dissertation.
Dummett M. (2007), “Reply to Jan Dejnožka,” [in:] The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, R.E. Auxier and L.E. Hahn (eds.), Open Court, Chicago: 114–126.
Frege G. (1918/1968), “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry,” [in:] Essays on Frege, E. Klemke (ed.), trans. A.M. Quinton and M. Quinton, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Frege G. (1903/1970), “Frege Against the Formalists,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Frege G. (1893/1967), The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, selections from vols. 1 and 2 (cites are to vol. 1.), trans. and ed. M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Frege G. (1892/1970), “On Concept and Object,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Frege G. (1892a/1970), “On Sense and Reference,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Frege G. (1884/1974), The Foundations of Arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number, 2d rev. ed., trans. J. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
Furth M. (1967), “Editor’s Introduction,” [in:] G. Frege, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, selections from vols. 1 and 2, trans. and ed. M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.