The Theoretical Difficulties of Memetics

Main Article Content

Kinga Kowalczyk-Purol

Abstract

Memetics is a research approach which applies evolutionary ideas and terminology to cultural phenomena. The core idea of memetics is the existence of the units of cultural evolution which are attributed autonomous replicating goals. Of course, such a controversial concept has gained many devoted adherents as well as its determined opponents. The paper discusses the theoretical difficulties of memetics. The first part discusses the analogy of genes and memes. The theme of the second part is the ontology of a cultural replicator. Finally, the third part presents the main issues related to manners of transmission and the adaptation of memes. In short, the aim of the paper is an evaluation of the explanatory potential of memetics. The explanatory potential of memetics will be evaluated in terms of its intrinsic consistency, the degree of its confirmation, the falsifiability of the theses which were elaborated on its basis and the heuristic value of this approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kowalczyk-Purol, Kinga. 2018. “The Theoretical Difficulties of Memetics”. Diametros 58 (58), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1285.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Kinga Kowalczyk-Purol, Department of Philosophy, Univesity of Szczecin

Kinga Kowalczyk-Purol, PhD
Univesity of Szczecin
Department of Philosophy
Krakowska 71-79
Pl-71-004 Szczecin
E-mail: kinga.kowpurol@gmail.com

Share |

References

Atran S. (2013), Ewolucyjny krajobraz religii, tłum. M. Kolan, Nomos, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M. (1998), Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology, Yale University Press, New Haven–Londyn.
View in Google Scholar

Blackmore S. (2001), The memes’ eye view, [w:] Darwinizing Culture: The Satus of Memetics as a Science, R. Aunger (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford–Nowy Jork: 25–42.
View in Google Scholar

Blackmore S. (2002a), Maszyna memowa, tłum. N. Radomski, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Blackmore S. (2002b), Memes as Good Science, [w:] The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience, M. Shermer (red.), ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara.
View in Google Scholar

Boyd R., Richerson P.J. (2001), Memes: Universal acid or a better mousetrap?, [w]: Darwinizing Culture: The Satus of Memetics as a Science, R. Aunger (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford-Nowy Jork: 144–162.
View in Google Scholar

Brodie R. (2011), Virus of the Mind. The New Science of the Meme, Hay House, Carlsbad.
View in Google Scholar

Buskes Ch. (2013), Darwinism Extended: A Survey of How the Idea of Cultural Evolution Evolved, „Philosophia” 41: 661–691.
View in Google Scholar

Crozier G.K.D. (2008), Reconsidering Cultural Selection Theory, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science” 59 (3): 455–479.
View in Google Scholar

Darwin K. (2006), O powstaniu gatunków drogą doboru naturalnego, czyli o utrzymywaniu się doskonalszych ras w walce o byt, tłum. S. Dickstein, J. Nusbaum, Jirafa Roja, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Dawkins R. (1996), Samolubny gen, tłum. M. Skoneczny, Pruszyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Dawkins R. (2003), Fenotyp rozszerzony. Dalekosiężny gen, tłum. J. Gliwicz, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Delius J.D. (1989), Of Mind Memes and Brain Bugs: A Natural History of Culture, [w:] The Nature of Culture, W.A. Koch (red.), Bochum Publications, Bochum: 26–79.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C. (1993), Consciousness Explained, The Penguin Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C. (1996), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, The Penguin Press, Nowy Jork.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C. (2006), From Typo to Thinko: When Evolution Graduated to Semantic Norms, [w:] Evolution and Culture, S. Levinson, P. Jaisson (red.), MIT Press, Cambridge: 133–145.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C. (2008), Odczarowanie. Religia jako zjawisko naturalne, tłum. B. Stanosz, PIW, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C. (2009), Memes and the Exploitation of Imagination, [w:] Philosophy after Darwin: classic and contemporary readings, M. Ruse (red.), Princeton University Press, Princeton-Oxford: 189–198.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C., Plantinga A. (2014), Nauka i religia. Czy można je pogodzić?, tłum. M. Furman, Ł. Kwiatek, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Durham W.H. (1991), Coevolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
View in Google Scholar

Gatherer D. (1998), Meme pools, World 3, and Averroes’s vision of immortality, „Zygon” 33 (2): 203–219.
View in Google Scholar

Hallpike R. (2011), On Primitive Society: And other Forbidden Topics, AuthorHouse, Bloomington.
View in Google Scholar

Heylighen F., Chielens K. (2009), Cultural Evolution and Memetics, [w:] Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, R.A. Meyers (red.), Springer, Nowy Jork: 3205–3220.
View in Google Scholar

Hodgson G.M., Knudsen T. (2006), Why we need a generalized Darwinism, and why generalized Darwinism is not enough, „Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization” 61: 1–19.
View in Google Scholar

Hull D.L. (2001a), Taking memetics seriously: Memetics will be what we make it, [w:] Darwinizing Culture: The Satus of Memetics as a Science, R. Aunger (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford-Nowy Jork: 44–67.
View in Google Scholar

Hull D.L. (2001b), Science and Selection. Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Jablonka E., Lamb M.J. (2014), Evolution in Four Dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, The MIT Press, Cambridge–Londyn.
View in Google Scholar

Kowalczyk-Purol K. (2016), Meme’s struggle for existence. The case of the category mistake in memetics, „Teksty z Ulicy. Zeszyt memetyczny” 17: 93–99.
View in Google Scholar

Kronfeldner M. (2011), Darwinian Creativity and Memetics, Acumen, Durham.
View in Google Scholar

Laland K.N., Brown G.R. (2002), Sense and Nonsense. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour, Oxford University Press, Oxford–Nowy Jork.
View in Google Scholar

Malec G. (2016), Kiedy Darwin stracił wiarę w Boga, „Diametros” 48: 38–54.
View in Google Scholar

Maynard Smith J. (2000), The Concept of Information in Biology, „Philosophy of Science” 67: 177–194.
View in Google Scholar

Mayr E. (2002), To jest biologia. Nauka o świecie ożywionym, tłum. J. Szacki, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Mayr E. (2003), The Growth of Biological Thought. Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, The Belknap Press Of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Polichak J.W. (2008), Meme as Pseudoscience, [w]: The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience, M. Schermer (red.), ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara: 664–677.
View in Google Scholar

Prinz J. (2011), hasło: Culture and Cognitive Science, [w]: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edycja zima 2011, E. N. Zalta (red.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/culture-cogsci [dostęp 4.02.2016].
View in Google Scholar

Rose N. (1998), Controversies in Meme Theory, „Journal of Memetics” 2, URL = http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1998/vol2/rose_n.html [dostęp 17.02.2016].
View in Google Scholar

Rosenberg A., McShea D.W. (2008), Philosophy of Biology. A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge, Nowy York.
View in Google Scholar

Sperber D. (1996), Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach, Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Sperber D. (2001), An objection to the memetic approach to culture, [w:] Darwinizing Culture: The Satus of Memetics as a Science, R. Aunger (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford- Nowy Jork: 164–173.
View in Google Scholar

Sperber D. (2012), Cultural attractors, [w:] This Will Make You Smarter. New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking, J. Brockman (red.), HarperCollins, Nowy Jork: 180–183.
View in Google Scholar

Such J., Szczęśniak M. (2006), Filozofi a nauki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Wilkins J.L. (1998), What’s in a Meme? Reflections from the perspective of the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology, „Journal of Memetics” 2, URL = http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/wilkins_js.html [dostęp 6.02.2016].
View in Google Scholar

Wilkins J. (1999), Memes Ain’t (Just) in the Head, „Journal of Memetics” 3, URL = http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1999/vol3/wilkins_j.html [dostęp 19.02.2016].
View in Google Scholar