Boredom That Wishes Not To Be

Article Sidebar

PDF (angielski) HTML (angielski)
Opublikowane: 2022-07-22
Zaktualizowany: 2022-07-22
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1744
Słowa kluczowe:
Heidegger, truth, boredom, attunement, metaphysics, temporality, meaning

Main Article Content

Borislav Mihačević
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Slovenia

Abstrakt

The present article deals with Heidegger’s research into boredom. The phenomenon cannot be simply described as an emotion but as a fundamental attunement, which represented a pathway to being qua being for Heidegger. Many scholars have argued that the philosopher’s treatment of the phenomenon led to sublimation or transgression in describing it beyond its phenomenological limits. While I agree with the general assessment, I also believe that there is a need to expand the argument further. I will argue that the cause of such transgression lies mainly in Heidegger’s inability to separate the truth from the notion of meaning or sense.

Article Details

Numer

Tom 19 Nr 72 (2022)

Dział

Artykuły
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Teksty zaproponowane do naszego czasopisma nie powinny być nigdzie publikowane przed ukazaniem się w „Diametros”. Wraz z przesłaniem swojego utworu redakcji autor akceptuje, że w momencie zakwalifikowania tekstu do publikacji czasopismo „Diametros” będzie stosowało licencję the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Na podstawie tej licencji autorzy zgadzają się, że ich prace mogą być zgodnie z prawem ponownie wykorzystywane do jakichkolwiek celów bez konieczności uzyskania uprzedniej zgody ze strony autora lub wydawcy. Każdy może prace te czytać, pobierać, kopiować, drukować, rozpowszechniać oraz przetwarzać, pod warunkiem poprawnego oznaczenia autorstwa oraz oryginalnego miejsca publikacji. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie do swoich utworów bez żadnych innych ograniczeń. Pełna informacja na temat licencji CC BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Jak cytować

„Boredom That Wishes Not To Be”. 2022. Diametros 19 (72): 26-43. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1744.

Bibliografia

Arendt H. (1978), The Life of the Mind, Harcourt, Inc, New York.

Arendt H. (1998), The Human Condition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Arendt H. (2005), “Socrates,” in: Hannah Arendt-The Promise of Politics, J. Kohn (ed.), Schocken Books, New York: 5–39.

Aristotle (1907), De Anima, trans. R.D. Hicks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Aristotle (1963), Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. J.L. Ackrill, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Boss M. (2009), “Metaphysics and the Mood of Deep Boredom: Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Mood,” in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 85–107.

Ciocan C. (2010), “Heidegger and the Problem of Boredom,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (1): 64–77.

Dalla Pezze B., Salzani C. (2009), “ The Delicate Monster: Modernity and Boredom,”in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 5–35.

Elpidorou A., Freeman L. (2019), “Is Profound Boredom Boredom?,” in: Heidegger on Affect, C. Hadjioannou (ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: 177–203.

Gibbs P. (2011), Heidegger’s Contribution to the Understanding of Work-Based Studies, Springer, London.

Heidegger M. (1949), Was ist Metaphysik?, Vittorio Klosetermann, Frankfurt am Main.

Heidegger M. (1968), What is Called Thinking?, trans. J.G. Gray, Harper&Row, New York.

Heidegger M. (1973), The End of Philosophy, trans. J. Stambaugh, Harper&Row, New York.

Heidegger M. (1984), The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. M. Heim, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Heidegger M. (1995), The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. W. McNeill, N. Walker, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (1996), Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Heidegger M. (1997), Plato’s Sophist, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (1998), “What is Metaphysics?,” in: Pathmarks, W. McNeill (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 82–97.

Heidegger M. (1998a), “On the Essence of Truth,” in: Pathmarks, W. McNeill (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 136–155.

Heidegger M. (2001), Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. R. Rojcewicz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (2002), “The Concept of Time in the Science of History,” in: Supplements, J. Van Buren (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany: 49–60.

Heidegger M. (2002), “Phenomenological Interpretations in Connection with Aristotle: An Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation,” in: Supplements, J.Van Buren (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany: 111–147.

Heidegger M. (2003), “My Way to Phenomenology,” in: Philosophical and Political Writings, M. Stassen (ed.), The Continuum, London: 70–77.

Heidegger M. (2005), Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. D.O. Dahlstrom, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (2008), Basic Concepts of Ancient Philosophy, trans. R. Rojcewicz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (2009), Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy, trans. R.D. Metcalf and M.B. Tanzer, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Heidegger M. (2010), Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. G. Fried, R. Polt, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Leslie I. (2009), “From Idleness to Boredom: On the Historical Development of Modern Boredom,” in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 35–61.

MacIntyre A. (1999), Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Open Court, Chicago and La Salle.

Nancy J.L. (2003), “A Finite Thinking,” in: A Finite Thinking, S. Sparks (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford: 3–31.

Parvis E. (1985), “Boredom as Limit and Disposition,” Heidegger Studies 1: 63–78.

Plato (1892), Theaetetus, trans. B. Jowett, in: Plato, The Dialogues of Plato, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Slaby J. (2010), “The Other Side of Existence: Heidegger on Boredom,” in: Habitus in Habitat II: Other Sides of Cognition, S. Flach and J. Süffner (eds.), Peter Lang AG, International Academic Publishers, Bern: 101–120.

Svendsen L. (2005), A Philosophy of Boredom, trans. J. Irons, Reaktion Books LTD, London.

Svendsen L. (2012), “Moods and the Meaning of Philosophy,” New Literary History 43 (3): 419–431.