Personalist ethics and the quadruple argument vs. the ethics of discourse [In Polish]

Article Sidebar

PDF (Polish) PDF (In Polish)
Published: Jun 1, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.24.2010.394

Main Article Content

Mariola Flis

Abstract

The argument presented in the article serves to support the idea that there is no cognitive sense in revitalizing obsolete ethical concepts, including personalist ethics with its quadruple argument. The ethics of discourse is very well suited to contemporary challenges since its method of justifying norms and standards can provide a basis for consensus. The principle of discourse is also the projection of a social order which is focused on replacing combat and strategic operations by discussion and argument. In this sense, the same formal principle of discourse is normative and is the projection of an important moral form of coexistence, which allows one to feel secure in a social space that is equally accessible to everyone.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Personalist Ethics and the Quadruple Argument Vs. The Ethics of Discourse [In Polish]”. 2010. Diametros, no. 24 (June): 58-70. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.24.2010.394.
Issue
No. 24 (2010)
Section
Other articles

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Mariola Flis

Mariola Flis - prof. dr hab., Dziekan Wydziału Filozoficznego UJ, Instytut Socjologii UJ

How to Cite

“Personalist Ethics and the Quadruple Argument Vs. The Ethics of Discourse [In Polish]”. 2010. Diametros, no. 24 (June): 58-70. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.24.2010.394.
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Benedict [1999] – R. Benedict, Chryzantemy i miecz, Warszawa 1999.

Dziki [2003] – J. Dziki, Dzieje życia na ziemi, Warszawa 2003.

Gellner [1990] – E. Gellner, Postmodernism, Cambridge 1990.

Hegel [1965] – G.W. Hegel, Fenomenologia ducha, Warszawa 1965.

Hegel [1967] – G.W. Hegel, Wykłady z filozofii dziejów, Warszawa 1967.

Kołakowski [1966] – L. Kołakowski, Filozofia pozytywistyczna (od Hume’a do Koła Wiedeńskiego), Warszawa 1966.

Kołakowski [1987] – L. Kołakowski, Husserl i poszukiwanie pewności, Warszawa 1987.

Kołakowski [1990] – L. Kołakowski, Horror metaphysicus, Warszawa 1990.

Lenartowicz [1984] – P. Lenartowicz, Elementy filozofii zjawiska biologicznego, Kraków 1984.

Kramer [1992] – H. Kramer, Integrative Ethik, Frankfurt/M 1992.

Martens, Schnadelbach [1995] – Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, E. Martens i H. Schnadelbach (red.), Warszawa 1995.

Mounier [1960] – E. Mounier, Personalizm, [w:] Wprowadzenie do egzystencjalizmu, Warszawa 1960.

Pułżański [1967] – T. Pułżański, Mounier, Warszawa 1967.

Ricoeur [1991] – P. Ricoeur, Osoba: struktura etyczna i moralna, [w:] Zawierzyć człowiekowi. Księdzu Józefowi Tischnerowi w sześćdziesiąte urodziny, Kraków 1991.

Russell [2006] – B. Russell, Religia i nauka, Warszawa 2006.

Schnadelbach [1995] – H. Schnadelbach, Rozum, [w:] Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, E. Martens i H. Schnadelbach (red.), Warszawa 1995.

Stróżewski [1984] – W. Stróżewski, Dialektyka twórczości, Kraków 1984.

Znaniecki [1922] – F. Znaniecki, Wstęp do socjologii, Poznań 1922.