Sartre and Merleau-Ponty’s Theories of Perception as Cognition in the Context of Phenomenological Thought in Cognitive Sciences
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Husserl’s phenomenology was particularly influential for a number of French philosophers and their theories. Two of the most prominent French thinkers, Jean-Paul Sartre and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, turned to the instruments offered by phenomenology in their attempts to understand the notions of the body, consciousness, imagination, human being, world and many others. Both philosophers also provided their definitions of perception, but they understood this notion in very different ways. The paper describes selected aspects of Husserl’s phenomenology that were adopted by Sartre and Merleau-Ponty and depicts the presumptions of their respective theories of perception, as well as the differences between them. The main thesis presented here is that theories as different as those proposed by Sartre and Merleau-Ponty may, and indeed do, lead to the same conclusion, i.e. that perception represents a different form of cognition. Despite the differences between these theories, they can both be placed in the contemporary context of phenomenological research carried out by cognitive philosophers Dan Zahavi and Shaun Gallagher, as well as by the proponent of the enactive theory of perception, Alva Noë.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Benoist J. (2001), L’idée de phénoménologie, Vrin, Paris.
Bickhard M.H. (1996), "Troubles with Computationalism,” [in:] The Philosophy of Psychology, W. O’Donohue, W. Kitchener (eds.), Sage, London: 173–183.
Breeur R. (2005), Autour de Sartre. La conscience mise à nu, Millon, Grenoble.
Brodsky J. (1981), “A Paradigm Case for Merleau-Ponty: The Ambiguity of Perception and the Paintings of Paul Cézanne,” Artibus et Historiae 2 (4): 125–134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1483119
Brook A. (2008), “Phenomenology: Contribution to Cognitive Science,” Abstracta 3: 54–70.
Bruzina R. (2004), “Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Moving Beyond the Paradigms,” Husserl Studies 20 (1): 43–88.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HSTU.0000015941.08655.dc
Cabestan P. (2015), Qui suis-je? Sartre et la question du sujet, Hermann, Paris.
Carman T. (2008), Merleau-Ponty, Routledge, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461853
Chemero A. (2009), Radical Embodied Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001
Clark A. (1999), “Embodied, Situated and Distributed Cognition,” [in:] A Companion to Cognitive Science, W. Bechtel, G. Graham (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford: 506–517.
Cohen-Solal A. (1985), Sartre 1905–1980, Gallimard, Paris.
Contat M., Rybalka M. (1970), Les écrits de Sartre, Gallimard, Paris.
Coorebyter de V. (2000), Sartre face à la phénoménologie. Autour L’intentionnalité et de La transcendance de l’Égo, Vrin, Paris.
Crowell S. (ed.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521513340
DeLay S. (2019), Phenomenology in France: A Philosophical and Theological Introduction, Routledge, London, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315272115
Depraz N. (2006), “Comprendre la phénoménologie. Une pratique concrète,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 129 (2): 149–165.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rphi.042.0149
Depraz N. (2011), A l’épreuve de l’expérience. Pour une pratique phénoménologique, Zeta Books, Bucharest.
Depraz N., Varela F., Vermersch P. (2003), On Becoming Aware. A Pragmatics of Experiencing, Benjamin Press, Amsterdam.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.43
Dreyfus H.L., Hall H. (1982), Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Farina G. (2014), “Quelques réflexions sur l’Esquisse d’une théorie des émotions à propos de l’affectivité de la pensés,” Études Sartriennes 17–18: 7–21.
Fruteau de Laclos F. (2012), La psychologie des philosophes de Bergson à Vernant, PUF, Paris.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.frute.2012.01
Gallagher S. (2011), "Interpretations of Embodied Cognition,” The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, Imprint Academic, Exeter.
Gallagher S., Schmicking D. (2010), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Springer, Berlin.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0
Gallagher S. (2012), Phenomenology, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283801
Gallagher S., Zahavi D. (2008), Phenomenological Mind, Routledge, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086599
Gerassi J. (1989), Jean-Paul Sartre. Hated Conscience of His Century, vol. I: Protestant or Protester?, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gibson J. (2015), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Husserl E. (1989), Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Kluwer, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2233-4
Kaelin E. (1962), An Existentialist Aesthetic, The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.
Landgrebe L. (1973), “The Phenomenological Concept of Experience,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1): 1–13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2106776
Levinas E. (1930), La théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, Alcan, Paris.
Macan Ch. (1993), Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Routledge, London, New York.
Marshall G. (2008), A Guide to Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, Marquette University Press, Milwaukee.
Martinich A.P., Stroll A. (2020), “The History of Epistemology,” [in:] Encyclopaedia Britannica, URL = https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology/The-history-of-epistemology#ref309032 [Accessed 15.12.2016].
McCulloch G. (1994), Using Sartre. An Analytical Introduction to Early Sartrean Themes, Routledge, London.
Merleau-Ponty M. (1955), Les Aventures de la dialectique, Gallimard, Paris.
Merleau-Ponty M. (1975), Les sciences de l’homme et la phénoménologie, Centre de documentation universitaire, Paris.
Merleau-Ponty M. (1992), Sense and Non-Sense, Northwestern University Press, Illinois.
Merleau-Ponty M. (2002), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. D.A. Landes, Routledge, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610
Merleau-Ponty M. (2004), The World of Perception, trans. O. Davis, Taylor & Francis e-Library, Milton Park.
Mouillie J.-M. (2001), Sartre et la phénoménologie, ENS, Paris.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mouil.2000.01
Neubauer B.E., Witkop C.T., Varpio L. (2019), “How Phenomenology Can Help us Learn from the Experiences of Others,” Perspectives on Medical Education 8 (2): 90–97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
Noë A. (2004), Action in Perception, MIT Press, London.
Pepper K. (2014), “The Phenomenology of Sensorimotor Understanding,” [in:] Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory, J.M. Bishop, A.O. Martin (eds.), Springer, Berlin: 53–67.
Pokropski M. (2011), “Ciało. Od fenomenologii do kognitywistyki,” Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki 4 (32): 119–137.
Rizk H. (2011), Comprendre Sartre, Colin, Paris.
Sartre J.-P. (1961), “Merleau-Ponty vivant,” Les Temps Modernes 184–185: 304–376.
Sartre J.-P. (1964), Situations IV, Gallimard, Paris.
Sartre J.-P. (2003a), Being and Nothingness, trans. H.E. Barnes, Routledge, London.
Sartre J.-P. (2003b), Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl: L'intentionnalité, Vrin, Paris.
Sartre J.-P. (2004a), The Transcendence of the Ego. A Sketch for a Phenomenological Description, trans. A. Brown, Routledge Press, London.
Sartre J.-P. (2004b), The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination, trans. J. Webber, Routledge, London.
Sartre J.-P. (2010), “Carnets de la drôle de guerre, 1er février 1940,” [in:] J.-P. Sartre, Les Mots et autres écrits autobiographiques, Gallimard, Paris: 462–473.
Sartre J.-P., Gerassi J. (2009), Talking with Sartre. Conversations and Debates, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
Schraube E. (2013), “First-Person Perspective and Sociomaterial Decentering: Studying Technology from the Standpoint of the Subject,” Subjectivity 6 (1): 12–32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.28
Seebohm T.M. (2002), “The Phenomenological Movement: A Tradition without Method? Merleau-Ponty and Husserl”, [in:] Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl, T. Toadvine, L. Embree (eds.), Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht: 51–71.
Shapiro L. (2011), Embodied Cognition, Routledge Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, New York.
Shapiro L. (2014), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, Routledge, Milton Park.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775845
Silverman D. (2018), “Bodily Skill and Internal Representation in Sensorimotor Perception,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (1): 157–173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9503-5
Smith D.W. (2013), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/ [Accessed 22.05.2020].
Smith M.B. (1993), The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Steward J. (1998), The Debate Between Sartre and Merleau-Ponty, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
Thompson E. (1995), Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception, Routledge Press, London.
Thompson E. (2001), Between Ourselves: Second Person Issues in the Study of Consciousness, Imprint Academic, Thorverton.
Thompson E., Noë A. (2002), Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, MIT Press, London.
Thompson E., Varela F. (2001), “Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10): 418–425.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
Thompson E., Varela F., Rosch E. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, MIT Press, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
Toadvine T.A. (1997), “The Art of Doubting. Merleau-Ponty and Cézanne,” Philosophy Today 41 (4): 545–553.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199741452
Ward D., Silverman D., Villalobos M. (2017), “Introduction: The Varieties of Enactivism,” Topoi 36 (3): 365–375.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6
Williford K. (2011), “Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness and the Autobiographical Ego,” [in:] Reading Sartre. On phenomenology and Existentialism, J. Webber (ed.), Routledge, London, New York: 195–211.
Wilson M. (2002), “Six Views of Embodied Cognition,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 625–636.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
Wolff E. (1955), “Conscience et Liberté chez Descartes et chez M. Sartre,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 145: 341–348.
Zahavi D. (1999), Self-Awareness and Alterity. A Phenomenological Investigation, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
Zahavi D. (2000), Exploring the Self. Philosophical and Psychopathological Perspectives on Self-Experience, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.23
Zahavi D. (2001), Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity, Ohio University Press, Athens.
Zahavi D. (2005), Subjectivity and Selfhood Investigating the First-Person Perspective, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6541.001.0001
Zahavi D. (2006), “Thinking about (Self-)Consciousness: Phenomenological Perspectives,” [in:] Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness, U. Krieger, K. Williford (eds.), MIT Press, Massachusetts: 273–295.