Global justice: a high-minded ideal or a genuine theory? (in Polish)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski) PDF (In Polish) Full text (Język Polski)
Published: Dec 1, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.26.2010.418

Main Article Content

Miłowit Kuniński

Abstract

In the article two seminal theories of global justice are compared: one concerned with individuals (Pogge’s), the other with peoples (Rawls’s). The striking feature of Pogge’s theory is that noble aims are to be achieved through the implementation of global justice for the permanent betterment of the situation of people living in extremely severe conditions. It is not entirely clear, however, whether helping them is a moral obligation or is due rather to a sense of guilt towards the descendants of the exploited. Justice among peoples, in turn, is a set of rules of the well-ordered society of peoples based on a social contract decided upon by the representatives of peoples. Rawls’s theory of relations among peoples is realistic, although he unconvincingly argues in favour of peoples as moral agents, neglecting the fact that the representatives play a governmental role, and that the social contract is in the end achieved by states rather than peoples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kuniński, Miłowit. 2010. “Global Justice: A High-Minded Ideal or a Genuine Theory? (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 26 (December):136-53. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.26.2010.418.
Issue
No. 26 (2010)
Section
Special topic – Global justice

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Miłowit Kuniński

dr hab. Miłowit Kuniński, profesor UJ
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Arystoteles [1956] – Arystoteles, Etyka Nikomachejska, tłum., oprac. i wstęp D. Gromska, PWN, Warszawa 1956.

Blake [2005] – M. Blake, International Justice, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/international-justice/.

Clayton [2010] – M. Clayton, Justice and Distribution, [w:] The Routledge Companion to Ethics, J. Skorupski (ed.), Routledge, London and New York 2010: 692-703.

Dicey [1982] – A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Roger E. Michener (ed.), Liberty Fund, Indianapolis 1982.

Ferguson [2002] – N. Ferguson, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power, Allen Lane, London 2002.

Hardin [1974] – G. Hardin, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, “Psychology Today” 8 (4) 1974: 38-43.

Hayek [1960] – F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1960.

Hayek [2004] – F.A. von Hayek, Zgubna pycha rozumu. O błędach socjalizmu, tłum. M. i T. Kunińscy, Wydawnictwo Arcana, Kraków 2004.

Hume [1985] – D. Hume, Idea of a perfect commonwealth, [w:] D. Hume, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, E.F. Miller (ed.), Liberty Classics, Indianapolis 1985.

Jones [1986] – S. Jones, Two Centuries of Overseas Trading: Origins and Growth of the Inchcape Group, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 1986.

Kant [1995a] – I. Kant, O porzekadle: To może być słuszne w teorii, ale nic nie jest warte w praktyce, [w:] O porzekadle: To może być słuszne w teorii, ale nic nie jest warte w praktyce; Do wiecznego pokoju. Projekt filozoficzny, krytyczne oprac., wstęp, uwagi, bibliografia i indeks H.F. Klemme, tłum. i przedmowa M. Żelazny, Wydawnictwo COMER, Toruń 1995.

Kant [1995b] – I. Kant, Do wiecznego pokoju. Projekt filozoficzny, [w:] O porzekadle: To może być słuszne w teorii, ale nic nie jest warte w praktyce; Do wiecznego pokoju. Projekt filozoficzny, krytyczne oprac., wstęp, uwagi, bibliografia i indeks H.F. Klemme, tłum. i przedmowa M. Żelazny, Wydawnictwo COMER, Toruń 1995.

Mulgan [2010] – T. Mulgan, Population Ethics, [w:] The Routledge Companion to Ethics, J. Skorupski (ed.), Routledge, London and New York 2010: 731-741.

O’Neill [1986] – O. O’Neill, Faces of Hunger. An Essay on Poverty, Justice and Development, Allen & Unwin, Lodon 1986.

O’Neill [2001] – O. O’Neill, The Agents of Justice, [w:] Global Justice, Th.W. Pogge (ed.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2001: 188-203.

Platon [1958] – Platon, Państwo, tłum. W. Witwicki, PWN, Warszawa 1958.

Plisecka [2002] – A. Plisecka, Definicja sprawiedliwości w filozofii Cycerona i w prawie rzymskim, „Studia Iuridica”, (XL) 2002: 131-139.

Pogge [1992] – Th.W. Pogge, Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty “Ethics”, 103 (1) 1992: 48-75.

Pogge [2008a] – Global Justice, Th.W. Pogge (ed.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2001.

Pogge [2008b] – Th. W. Pogge, World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms, 2nd ed., Polity Press, Cambridge, Malden 2008.

Pogge [2010] – World Poverty, [w:] The Routledge Companion to Ethics, J. Skorupski (ed.), Routledge, London and New York 2010: 796-807.

Powszechna Deklaracja Praw Człowieka [1948] – Powszechna Deklaracja Praw Człowieka, dostępne na: http://www.unesco.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Powszechna_ Deklaracja_Praw_Czlowieka.pdf.

Rawls [1999] – J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1999.

Rawls [2001] – J. Rawls, Prawo ludów, tłum. M. Kozłowski, Fundacja ALETHEIA 2001.

Szlachta [2004] – B. Szlachta, hasło „sprawiedliwość”, [w:] Słownik społeczny, B. Szlachta (red.), Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2004.