The Power of Stories: Responsibility for the Use of Autobiographical Stories in Mental Health Debates
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Autobiographical stories do not merely offer insights into someone’s experience but can constitute evidence or even serve as self-standing arguments for a given viewpoint in the context of public debates. Such stories are likely to exercise considerable influence on debate participants’ views and behaviour due to their being more vivid, engaging, and accessible than other forms of evidence or argument. In this paper we are interested in whether there are epistemic and moral duties associated with the use of autobiographical stories in mental health debates. We argue that debate participants have a responsibility to assess a story as evidence or as an argument when the story is put forward to support a given viewpoint. We also make some preliminary suggestions about what can be done to ensure that the use of stories contributes to the variety of the resources available to debate participants without compromising the quality of the argumentation or increasing polarisation.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Allport G.W. (1954), The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge/Reading.
Brown L. (2011), “The Significance of Semantics: Person First Language: Why it Matters,” Autistic Hoya, 4th August, URL = https://www.autistichoya.com/2011/08/significance-of-semantics-person-first.html [Accessed 30.09.2018].
Cubitt S. (2003), “Anecdotal Evidence,” NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies 2 (1): 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2013.1.CUBI
Gabriel Y. (2000), Storytelling in Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198290957.001.0001
Gask L. (2018), “Diagnosis, Power and Suffering,” Patching the Soul, 28 January, URL= https://lindagask.com/2018/01/28/diagnosis-power-and-suffering/ [Accessed 30.09.2018].
Gillett G. (2005), “The Unwitting Sacrifi ce Problem,” Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 327–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009613
Grandin T. (2008), The Way I See It: A Personal Look at Autism and Asperger’s, Future Horizons, Arlington.
Hacking I. (2009a), “Autistic Autobiography,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 1467–1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0329
Hacking I. (2009b), “How We Have Been Learning to Talk about Autism: A Role for Stories,” Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4): 499–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x
Handley J.P. (2018), How to End the Autism Epidemic, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction.
Higashida N. (2014), The Reason I Jump: One Boy’s Voice from the Silence of Autism, trans. D. Mitchell and K.A. Yoshida, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Jaarsma P., Welin S. (2012), “Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement,” Health Care Analysis 20 (1): 20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9
Jackson M. (2002), The Politics of Storytelling, Museum Tusculanum Press.
Johnstone L., Boyle M., Cromby J., Dillon J., Harper D., Kinderman P., Longden E., Pilgrim D., Read J. (2018), The Power Threat Meaning Framework: Towards the Identification of Patterns in Emotional Distress, Unusual Experiences and Troubled or Troubling Behaviour, as an Alternative to Functional Psychiatric Diagnosis, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
Jones M., Anderson Crow D. (2017), “How Can We Use the ‘Science of Stories’ to Produce Persuasive Scientific Stories?,” Palgrave Communications 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0047-7
Kapp S.K., Gillespie-Lynch K., Sherman L.E., Hutman T. (2013), “Deficit, Difference, or Both? Autism and Neurodiversity,” Developmental Psychology 49 (1): 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353
Larkin M. (2018), “On the Power Threat Meaning Framework,” Imperfect Cognitions, 22 May, URL=http://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2018/05/on-power-threat-meaning-framework_22.html [Accessed 30.09.2018].
Markovits H., Schmeltzer C. (2007), “What Makes People Revise Their Beliefs Following Contradictory Anecdotal Evidence? The Role of Systemic Variability and Direct Experience,” Cognitive Science 31 (3): 535–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701326600
May K. (2018), “Autism from the Inside,” Aeon Magazine, URL=https://aeon.co/essays/the-autistic-view-of-the-world-is-not-the-neurotypical-cliche [Accessed 18.03.2019].
Mitchell J. (2007), “Neurodiversity: Just Say No,” URL=http://www.jonathans-stories.com/non-fiction/neurodiv.html [Accessed 30.09.2018].
Moore A., Stilgoe J. (2009), “Experts and Anecdotes: The Role of ‘Anecdotal Evidence’ in Public Scientific Controversies,” Science, Technology, & Human Values 34 (5): 654–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243908329382
Sarrett J.C. (2011), “Trapped Children: Popular Images of Children with Autism in the 1960s and 2000s,” Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (2): 141–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-010-9135-z
Tracy K. (2012), Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities, Guilford Press, New York.
Webb N. (2018), “My Mother Took Her Own Life – and Now I Know a Different Mental Health Approach Could Have Saved Her,” The Independent, 17 February, URL=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/mental-health-trauma-services-mother-family-individual-children-a8215511.html [Accessed 30.09.2018].